Sswan60:
You can buy GluLam columns of that size, made up of 4 – 2x8’s, and you can get them pressure treated too, for their bearing on a conc. wall or pier found. They are sold specifically/primarily to the Ag. and post-frame building industry for this type of bldg. You might consider cols. made from 4 – 2x10’s so you could cut a horiz. seat/notch in the top of the col. for the perpendicular beams. Then you have a whole different loading condition on the beam connection hardware at the col. The beam is supported in bearing and held to the col. with the fasteners. Your detail is problematic for both end and edge dist. on the beam and for the bolt or screw edge dist. on the nail lam’ed. col. plys. The end and edge dist’s. from the NDS are minimums and probably not adequate (at least need some serious engineering thought and judgement) when both a shear loading and end moment component are applied to the bolt/screw, thus causing end splitting or tension perpendicular to the grain near an edge. Then, as JAE mentions, on all of your connections on your cols. you have to pay considerable attention to getting your fastener loads into the inner plys, not just the outer 2x ply. That is more nailing, bigger bolts or screws, etc. That said, here are plenty of farm and post/frame bldgs. standing out there, essentially with your detail, if you don’t care about good/sound engineering, or you don’t care which bldg. code you don’t follow. There are also a bunch of instances where your type of beam connections have failed.