Hora
I have flex II package. I have a class A surface from IGES that I want to rebuild and make parametric. I realize that I will need 2 files to do this. The first file is the IGES that I import. Then "Datum Curve Project" onto IGES surface. Save the file and then SAVE-AS (Neutralm, IGES, STEP) I realize the cross-section will not be parametric because the feature is listed as a "imported feature". This was my plan, first create 12 sections through desired surface via Datum > curve > project onto iges surface. Then do a "file - save as" neutral, (or STEP or IGES). Third, import (insert - data from file) into desire part. We now have an import feature with surface and datum curves. Clean up the import feature thru redefine and delete unwanted stuff. Then create surfaces through import feature datum curves via Create - surface - advance - variable swept blend. This is where the parametric comes in. When a revision happens; I go back to the file that has the 12 projected sections replace the import feature with new import feature and during "fail mode" reroute or redefine the surface to new datum curves. My first thought was accuracy. I don't know it STEP or IGES'ing out Datum curves was a good Idea. I am trying to build a techniquing for dealing with CRAP CATIA surfaces. I get a so-call class A and find .25 to .50 degrees of error on adjacent surfaces. I find thru gauss curvature dumple or "oil can effect" in surfaces, surface that fold back on itself. Back to my question, Does this sound like a effective technique. thanks Texaspete