For an RQD of about 50, I'd use an Efield/Elab ratio of 0.2. Citing bearing value is of little relavance. More important is the unconfined compressive strength of the intact rock mass or the laboratory modulus value (from the stress-strain curve).
Deere (1969) presents a correlation between RQD and rock mass modulus. For RQD in the range of 35 to 50 his correlation would suggest a value of 0.1 to 0.3 GPa. Note that this is fairly arbitrary in that the correlation does not take into account the value of the intact rock mass - it's just based on RQD.
Another item of note: Rock mass behavior is stress dependent. Depending on your anticipated stresses, the modulus value may exhibit strain hardening or strain softening behavoir. There are some data to model strain-softening behavior (hyperbolic modulus values). This may be more than you are asking for right now. . . .
f-d
¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!