Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Dyno Results using Standard, Filed, and Gapless Rings 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

RodRico

Automotive
Joined
Apr 25, 2016
Messages
508
Location
US
Nice article from Hot Rod Network I thought others might enjoy. Below are their dyno results using factory gapped, file gapped, and gapless rings.

Factory Gap:
Peak HP: 434.7 hp @ 5,700 RPM
Peak Torque: 450 lb-ft @ 4,400 RPM
Average HP (3,000-6,000 rpm): 363.3 HP
Average Torque (3,000-6,000 rpm): 425.6 lb-ft

Filed Gap:
Peak HP: 441 hp @ 5,700 RPM
Peak Torque: 459.2 lb-ft @ 4,500 RPM
Average HP (3,000-6,000 RPM): 370 hp
Average Torque (3,000-6,000 RPM): 433.9 lb-ft

Gapless:
Peak HP: 451 hp @ 5,600 RPM
Peak Torque: 465 lb-ft @ 4,500 RPM
Average HP (3,000-6,000 RPM): 375 HP
Average Torque (3,000-6,000 RPM): 440 lb-ft
 
Looks to all be within standard variability.
 
Interesting, but an A-B-A test sequence for each ring type would sure have been nice.

These ring gap test results on pages 1 and 2 originally appeared along with a cool graph in a document from Speed-Pro back when the parent company Sealed Power was on its own, and a premium product.
 
GregLocock, I'm not sure to whom your question is directed. If it was me, the answer is no, not yet. I'm still trying to decide which ring type to use.
 
Rod, I know they call them that, the comment wasn't to you.
 
Yes, it's standard in a magazine test, the advertiser's product always produces the most power

In production engine quantity, piston rings are an ant-shit cost component. If the Total Seal Gapless were actually worth 3.5% additional horsepower and torque, they'd be universally used.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top