Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

drafting methods 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

palecactus

Mechanical
Jun 21, 2006
26
is it okay to dimension section views.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Definitely, otherwise they would only be good for assembly drawings.
 
You shouldn't dimension in an isometric view because it doesn't show true size and shape and you can't dimension to a "hidden" feature. Cut views, section views, etc. are all okay as long as it is clear what the feature is that you are dimensioning (true size and shape).
 
You can find everything you need to know about section views in Multi and Secional View Drawings ASME/ANSI Y14.3. It's a good buy. I'm currently redesigning a high speed miniture mechanism and was looking at the drawings. I found numerous mistakes: wrong projections, wrong callouts, dimensions to hidden lines and the granddaddy of them all a section view with hidden lines

Best Regards,

Heckler
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SW2005 SP 5.0 & Pro/E 2001
Dell Precision 370
P4 3.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
XP Pro SP2.0
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)

Never argue with an idiot. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience every time.
 
It depends on which standard you are refering to, and whether you are using board drawings or CAD drawings of solid models. ASME Y14.41-2003 definitely allows dimensioning to axonometric views (which are similar to iso views) on the drawing.
 
Section views are OK to dim. I agree, do not dim to hidden lines.

Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-05)
 
Palecactus

Yes!


Ok that's the short version.

I prefer sections to use of hidden line most of the time, I thought it was in a standard somewhere that sections etc are preferable but I couldn't find it last time I looked.

aardvarkdw,

I'm with you on ISO views but in my post the other day people seemed to think 14.41 might allow this.

Ken
 
Not only are sections preferable, but dimensioning to hidden lines is not a preferable method per Y14.5. Para "Dimensions should be shown in true profile and refer to visible outlines."
 
Omitted in my previous post: Para 1.4(c)
 
In some cases it is ok to dim to a "hidden" line, by drawing a broken out section, that makes the "hidden" line visible... but you should use this method discretely.

Wes C.
------------------------------
When they broke open molecules, they found they were only stuffed with atoms. But when they broke open atoms, they found them stuffed with explosions...
 
But then it is no longer hidden;) - That is a widely used method to get around hidden lines.
 
IF ENOUGH INFO IS IN TWO VIEWS IN A DRAWING OF A PART, MUST YOU INCLUDE THE THIRD,(I:E TOP,FRONT,RIGHT)
 
No, if a view adds no information (callouts, dimensions, etc) you do not add it. Drawings are supposed to be a CONCISE definition of the part.
 
You don't have to yell! [lol]
You only need another view if needed.

Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-05)
 
In fact, some items only require one view, such as a cylinder or sphere.
 
I have a friend that used to teach drafting. He asked them to do a 3 view dwg of a ball bearing. Most of the class failed.

Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-05)
 
For a cylinder I usually put two views. People seem to miss the diameter symbol otherwise. Or do you know something I'm overlooking?

On the hidden in Y14.5, thanks ewh don't know why I couldn't find that the other day.

Ken
 
Your right that people may miss the diameter at first, but when they try to find the depth of the part, they usually see it.
 
Chris,
Was he requiring three views or just as many views as nessesary?

ewh,
I agree there are times when dimensions are allowable in iso or axo views as with ASME y14.41 but that I believe refers only to 3d models not to 2d drawings. I may be wrong on that, as I've mentioned in other threads I am still working on getting a copy of the y14 series here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor