Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
does i need to balance one flywheel? 1
- Thread starter 181273
- Start date
Yes, you do need to balance it. And if you are seriously asking this question you should evacuate the inhabitants within a 500m radius around whatever you are building. Just in case it disintegrates because you didn't balance it properly.
----------------------------------
Sometimes I wake up Grumpy.
Other times I just let her sleep!
----------------------------------
Sometimes I wake up Grumpy.
Other times I just let her sleep!
- Thread starter
- #3
- Thread starter
- #4
- Thread starter
- #5
-
1
- #6
electricpete
Electrical
I agree with Scotty that it needs to be balanced. A competent person on-site needs to supervise the job to ensure safety.
With that said, if the piece is uniform, and you perform a runout test after installation (radial/rim runout for concentricity and axial/rim runout for wobble), then there is some degree of expectation that the piece is balanced although not foolproof (it were a cast piece then there could be internal voids... doesn't seem very likely with a flywheeel probably steel, but you never know).
Also you can do a qualitative static balance on an arbor or when installed onto the machine shaft in bearings. Position the flywheeel at a few different positions and it should always tend to move to a position with a certain side down. How fast is drops depends on magnitude of the unbalance and the friction of the bearings. You could in theory calibrate your test by attaching a known unbalance and seeing how fast that goes to the bottom. If your machine rotates much slower without the known unbalance, than the residual unbalnace is much lower.
The type of balance uncovered in the above type test is known as static unbalance. There can also be couple unbalance, but not very likely if you have a high D/L such as a flywheel, and you have good face runout.
Above is just some thought process and checks that can be considered, but in the end it's better not to take shortcuts when the stakes are high. Comments such as mine from an anonymous internet guy far away are no substitute for a competent person on-site to specify the tests and perform the necessary tests.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
With that said, if the piece is uniform, and you perform a runout test after installation (radial/rim runout for concentricity and axial/rim runout for wobble), then there is some degree of expectation that the piece is balanced although not foolproof (it were a cast piece then there could be internal voids... doesn't seem very likely with a flywheeel probably steel, but you never know).
Also you can do a qualitative static balance on an arbor or when installed onto the machine shaft in bearings. Position the flywheeel at a few different positions and it should always tend to move to a position with a certain side down. How fast is drops depends on magnitude of the unbalance and the friction of the bearings. You could in theory calibrate your test by attaching a known unbalance and seeing how fast that goes to the bottom. If your machine rotates much slower without the known unbalance, than the residual unbalnace is much lower.
The type of balance uncovered in the above type test is known as static unbalance. There can also be couple unbalance, but not very likely if you have a high D/L such as a flywheel, and you have good face runout.
Above is just some thought process and checks that can be considered, but in the end it's better not to take shortcuts when the stakes are high. Comments such as mine from an anonymous internet guy far away are no substitute for a competent person on-site to specify the tests and perform the necessary tests.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
- Thread starter
- #7
i agree with you... and I know that theory, but in example, if i see a excentricity due to a bad mounting process between shaft and fly wheel, in example 0,6 mm, how could this affects the bearings? vibrations?
the question is: no balance, and a bad mounting process... (the fly wheel is not at 90º with the shaft)... I hope you´ll understand...
not is posible to turn it easy, cause is mounted on the generator on site... and it´s giving problems of heat on the bearings.... or that´s what i think....
the question is: no balance, and a bad mounting process... (the fly wheel is not at 90º with the shaft)... I hope you´ll understand...
not is posible to turn it easy, cause is mounted on the generator on site... and it´s giving problems of heat on the bearings.... or that´s what i think....
- Thread starter
- #8
electricpete
Electrical
0.6 mm (600 micron) offset at 1,000 RPM will take a perfectly balanced machine and make it somewhere between G40 and G100 (not where you want to be)
This based on the chart page 5 of 11 here:
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
This based on the chart page 5 of 11 here:
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
electricpete
Electrical
flywheel not at 90 degree with the shaft is also a big problem.
180 mm shaft (~7") carrying 60"x 3.5" flywheel. That doesn't seem out of whack to me, but I guess it depends on a lot of factors (bearing location, bearing spacing, worst-case torque transmitted, proximity to resonance).
Another very strange thing about large diameter flywheels is that the inside diameter is larger when rotating than when stationary due to centrifigual force. For some very large flywheels that we have around 6' diameter, there are special key arrangements to cope with that. I'm not sure if it is a concisderation for your flywheel.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
180 mm shaft (~7") carrying 60"x 3.5" flywheel. That doesn't seem out of whack to me, but I guess it depends on a lot of factors (bearing location, bearing spacing, worst-case torque transmitted, proximity to resonance).
Another very strange thing about large diameter flywheels is that the inside diameter is larger when rotating than when stationary due to centrifigual force. For some very large flywheels that we have around 6' diameter, there are special key arrangements to cope with that. I'm not sure if it is a concisderation for your flywheel.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Question