wsg SE PE
Nuclear
- May 6, 2015
- 7
I am going over the Moment Magnification Procedure for non-sway columns as described in ACI318-11 Section 10.01.6 and I noticed a difference in the code relative to ACI318-08 that I cannot find discussion or documentation of anywhere on the internet.
Equation 10-16 in ACI318-08 limits the value of Cm to a minimum of 0.4. However, this limitation is gone in ACI318-11. This can lead to a *significant* difference in the final magnification factor which, in turn, can lead to a *significant* difference in the final (magnified) design moment of the column. Further, this difference is in the unconservative direction, the design moment is allowed to be smaller relative to the 2008 version of the code. For example, in the problem I am currently working though (in preparation for the SE exam in the fall), this single change in the code reduced my design moment by a factor of 2 (Cm = 0.2 instead of 0.4).
Can anyone speak to this? Is this an intentional change? Am I misreading the code / overlooking the discussion about a lower-bound limit on Cm?
Thank you for your time.
Will Godfrey
Equation 10-16 in ACI318-08 limits the value of Cm to a minimum of 0.4. However, this limitation is gone in ACI318-11. This can lead to a *significant* difference in the final magnification factor which, in turn, can lead to a *significant* difference in the final (magnified) design moment of the column. Further, this difference is in the unconservative direction, the design moment is allowed to be smaller relative to the 2008 version of the code. For example, in the problem I am currently working though (in preparation for the SE exam in the fall), this single change in the code reduced my design moment by a factor of 2 (Cm = 0.2 instead of 0.4).
Can anyone speak to this? Is this an intentional change? Am I misreading the code / overlooking the discussion about a lower-bound limit on Cm?
Thank you for your time.
Will Godfrey