Norzul,
Key elements to any successful retrofit project are accurate collation of all relevant data and proper planning.
Retrofitting of DGS is always difficult and should not be considered lightly. If the seals are not supported by a suitable control system they will not function correctly and lead times on refurbs can be costly and time consuming.
On critical plant it is also advisable to have a rotordynamic study completed to ensure that critical frequencies of the rotor are not brought within the operating condition of the compressor as a result in changes to the damping charachteristics from the seals.
200 bar is a high pressure application, yes there are now numerous examples of DGS sealing to 350 bar but in the case of retrofits they are not so common.
First stage is to asses the suitability of the casing in question. DGS require more space than some wet seals which may mean that modifications to the casing are required, in addition suitable ports must be supplied to allow for seal gas and vents. A typical tandem seal with barrier seal outboard would require 4 suitable ports.
In addition a word of caution on Barrier seal gas supply, instrument air can be used however depending on the process/ seal gas used there will be some leakage through the 2nd stage of the DGS. This can lead to an explosive mixture in the secondary vent, a safer option is to use Nitrogen.
All that said the benifits of DGS retrofit are considerable and most would normally pay for themselves in less than 2 years and continue to show considerable efficiency improvement and reduced operating costs in subsequent years.
B rgds
cfin