Kudos to dcasto.
I appreciate the Schlumberger reference he furnishes with regards to such an important and mis-understood phenomena as retrograde condensation. The curve furnished is an excellent illustration of what can happen in a hydrocarbon reservoir.
However, I am very disappointed in the awful and inaccurate job that Schlumberger has done in its definition of terms - which goes directly to the understanding of this phase phenomena.
Here, I am not trying to apply semantics or nit picking definitions. I believe it is important to thoroughly understand all the basic engineering terms in order to understand what is happening in retrograde condensation. I list the obvious and basic errors in the given Schlumberger definition of terms for the benefit of those interested in learning more about this phenomena:
Phase = the physical state in which a substance or a fluid finds itself in – such as: vapor phase, liquid phase, solid phase, mixed phase (a combination of the previous phases). It has NOTHING to do with motion or waves in this context.
Bubblepoint = The temperature – at a given base pressure - at which the first bubble of vapor is generated from a liquid due to vaporization caused by expansion or boiling.
Dewpoint = The temperature at which the first condensate liquid comes out of solution in a gas condensate. It is NOT the pressure.
Single Phase = One phase. It has nothing to do with the quantity of components in the state under which the fluid finds itself. It is either a vapor, liquid, or solid.
Pressure = a UNIT force distributed over a surface. It is NOT just a force; that is why it is expressed as per the applied area.