Deformation compatibility for column according to ASCE7-10

[geo321]

Hello, this is my first project in a Seismic Design Category D. I am checking the code requirements regarding the deformation compatibility (ASCE7-10 - section 12.12.5).
I have 2 interrogations where I would like to have your opinions:

1. Whenever I obtain the maximum story drift, should I analyze my column (not participating in the lateral resisting system) as a single frame considering both ends pinned and the top support subject to a lateral displacement equal to the story drift?

2. is there any requirement for the columns to be considered as acting in the LRFS ? any minimum base shear the columns should take to consider them as resisting the earthquake ?

Thank you in advance

 

[HTURKAK]

1. Whenever I obtain the maximum story drift, should I analyze my column (not participating in the lateral resisting system) as a single frame considering both ends pinned and the top support subject to a lateral displacement equal to the story drift?

2. is there any requirement for the columns to be considered as acting in the LRFS ? any minimum base shear the columns should take to consider them as resisting the earthquake ?

The columns which support only axial load , not included in the seismic force-resisting system shall be analyzed assuming hinged at top and bottom . But , they shall be designed for the gravity load effects however shall be detailed ductile and compatible with seismic drift.

The commentary of 12.12.5 is available ASCE 7-16 which explains this situation in detail . C12.12.5 Deformation Compatibility for Seismic Design
Categories D through F.'.....This provision requires the designer to provide a level of ductile detailing or proportioning to all elements of the structure appropriate to the calculated deformation demands at the design story drift, Δ. This provision may be accomplished by applying details in gravity members similar to those used in members of the seismic force-resisting system or by providing sufficient strength in those members, or by providing sufficient stiffness in the overall structure to preclude ductility demands in those members...'