Jacobs60bx
Civil/Environmental
- May 24, 2009
- 5
I bench tested a 50 year old Robbins & Myers 250 rpm, 400 pound, 3000 watt, 120 vdc generator with a 188 segment commutator. These generators have 4 brushes. Three of the brushes, as originally equipped, are a soft carbon/graphite composition and the fourth brush, originally installed in the lower left position, is a hard carbon composition. I installed 4 of the original soft carbon/graphite brushes for bench testing. When the output rose above about 10 amperes, the lower left brush started arcing severely even though I had properly seated all the brushes. After I replaced the lower left brush with the correct original hard carbon brush, arcing was greatly reduced. I also tested another similar generator and had very similar results. I tried "lifting" each individual brush, one at a time, while the generators were running and there was very little difference in arcing of the remaining working brushes. I double checked the neutral setting of both brush rings with a 6 volt battery not trusting the factory marks...they checked good. I megged and growled both armatures and they checked good. The original manual states "There are two kinds of brushes used in the generator......the three brushes marked A-10 are to be installed in the two positive holders which are the upper and lower on the right side. Install the one brush marked 400NC in the other negative holder (lower left)."
These generators are shunt wound with simplex progressing wave windings.
Shouldn't all the brushes in a generator or motor conduct the same amount of current regardless of location? Robbins & Myers obviously corrected an arcing problem by using two different kinds of brushes. Does anyone know, at least in theory, why it's necessary other than to eliminate excessive brush arcing?