boffintech
Civil/Environmental
- Jul 29, 2005
- 469
Considering that ACI-318 reads:
Crosstie — A continuous reinforcing bar having a
seismic hook at one end and a hook not less than 90
degrees with at least a six-diameter extension at the
other end. The hooks shall engage peripheral longitudinal
bars. The 90 degree hooks of two successive
crossties engaging the same longitudinal bars shall be
alternated end for end.
I take this to mean that ALL crossties in structural elements (with the one exception of spandrel beams) are alternated end for end. I see lots of crossties in columns and shearwalls, and a few in pile caps for shearwalls, but not so often in beams.
Am inspecting on a job now where the EOR shows a beam detail with a vertical crosstie.
This 36x36 beam has 6#11T w/2nd layer of 4#11T and 7#11B w/ 2nd layer of 3#11 and one closed tie (135 hks at corner) and one center vertical crosstie.
Structural engineers would expect to see this vertical crosstie alternated end for end, right?
Crosstie — A continuous reinforcing bar having a
seismic hook at one end and a hook not less than 90
degrees with at least a six-diameter extension at the
other end. The hooks shall engage peripheral longitudinal
bars. The 90 degree hooks of two successive
crossties engaging the same longitudinal bars shall be
alternated end for end.
I take this to mean that ALL crossties in structural elements (with the one exception of spandrel beams) are alternated end for end. I see lots of crossties in columns and shearwalls, and a few in pile caps for shearwalls, but not so often in beams.
Am inspecting on a job now where the EOR shows a beam detail with a vertical crosstie.
This 36x36 beam has 6#11T w/2nd layer of 4#11T and 7#11B w/ 2nd layer of 3#11 and one closed tie (135 hks at corner) and one center vertical crosstie.
Structural engineers would expect to see this vertical crosstie alternated end for end, right?