Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Contactor Interlocked Auto change over Vs Motorized MCCB Change Over 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

NickParker

Electrical
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
455
Location
NL
The distribution board gets power from two UPS and I'm planning to install a Auto change over system. (Break before make)

Since the loads are critical (but can accept a short time interruption), which is beneficial? Contactor Interlocked Auto change over (or) Motorized MCCB Change Over
 
Contactor based changeover ill be faster than the MCCB one.
The choice depends on how long the load can withstand power interruption!
If it is just a few milliseconds, you may need a static switch even.
 
Dear Mr. NickParker (Electrical)(OP)22 Dec 21 08:49
"...The distribution board gets power from two UPS and I'm planning to install a Auto change over system. (Break before make). Since the loads are critical (but can accept a short time interruption), which is beneficial? Contactor Interlocked Auto change over (or) Motorized MCCB Change Over".
1. Both mechanically interlocked [contactor] or [motorized MCCB] are acceptable; if the transfer speed is within the acceptable short time interruption.
2. Contactor is lower cost and lower short-circuit (kA) capacity. Attention: may need to add fuses, which is a serious security setback!
3. Motorized MCCB is higher in cost but with much higher short-circuit (kA) capacity. Attention: no additional fuses are required.
4. For higher security, motorized MCCB is a better choice, if security supersedes the cost. See 2. above.
Che Kuan Yau (Singapore)
 
Is there any issue with applying a Motorised swich disconnector as a Incomer instead of MCCB for the auto change over scheme?

Auto_Change_Over_pxjpu8.png
 
Dear Mr. NickParker (Electrical)(OP)24 Jan 22 11:08
"...Is there any issue with applying a Motorised swich disconnector as a Incomer instead of MCCB for the auto change over scheme? ..."
1. The two incoming conductors are protected by the respective MCCBs in DB "A" and "B" . The issue is on the [device selection for the auto changeover scheme]. There is no protection function. Therefore, [ Motorised switch disconnector] instead of [ MCCB ] may be acceptable.
2. Attention:
a) the Motorised switch disconnector usually of lower short-circuit kA rating shall be coordinated with the up-stream MCCB in the DB.
b) the out-goings conductors to the final loads shall be individually protected by MCCB/MCB of appropriate current ratings.
Che Kuan Yau (Singapore)







mcb
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top