Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Concentrated Load on Metal Deck

Status
Not open for further replies.

RFreund

Structural
Aug 14, 2010
1,885
Is there a procedure to determine the effective width of a roof deck subject to point load (say a ballast tray for example)?

I thought I had found one at one time, but can't seem to find what I was looking for.

Thanks!

EIT
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Given the nature of deck, it's hard to imagine that you'd get much distribution beyond the loaded surface. It's really no better than flat plate stock in the direction perpendicular to the flutes. In fact, it's worse because the corrugation makes the deck length effectively longer. Maybe one flute beyond the loaded area on each side? If you want this badly enough, it would be relatively straight forward to model in SAP etc by accounting for the flexural anisotropy in your property modifiers.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
by accounting for the flexural anisotropy in your property modifiers

You are referring to modifying the I.x and S.x values, etc. for each direction?

I was thinking that you would mostly likely get the width of the piece of deck (I think typically 36"). hmm....

EIT
 
RFreund said:
You are referring to modifying the I.x and S.x values, etc. for each direction?

Yesir. If you do this, I want to see the results.

RFreund said:
I was thinking that you would mostly likely get the width of the piece of deck (I think typically 36")

I'm looking up at exposed deck as I type. If you only loaded one flute at the edge of a 3' sheet on a 5' span, I very much doubt that you'd get meaningful participation from the flute on the other side of the 3' sheet. I don't know how to evaluate that, however, short of conducting the modelling exercise.

The shear connections between sheets seem to always occur at or near vertical flute legs. As such, I feel that shear could be transferred across multiple sheets nearly as well as it could be transferred within 3' sheets. Following this through, that suggests that you may not be limited to just the loaded sheet. That's just my gut feel however. If this was my baby, I'd be tempted to just use the loaded flutes.




I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
I don't have SAP, but maybe this can be done in Staad Pro. Possible model a plate with the equivalent properties, although I'm not sure if the weak direction properties are available.

I'll let you know if it goes there.

EIT
 
Check the roof deck manufacturer's catalog and the mfr's technical rep for their recommendations. This sounds like a common problem that they may have already addressed to their satisfaction at least.

Richard L. Flower, P. E., LEED Green Associate
Senior Structural Engineer
Complere Engineering Group, Inc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor