DRW75
Structural
- Oct 14, 2004
- 89
Hey folks,
I've got a project whereby I am relocating an existing building to a new location. It seemed to me the best way to do this is to pour the foundations(and piers) without anchor bolts, and then match-drill the concrete once the columns are in place via crane as required. I just wanted to make sure that there weren’t any big issues with this... I've called out chemical anchors which are sized as are needed, but from a construction feasibility point of view, what would be a big downfall with this way of setting columns?
For a new construct, I would call out standard anchor bolts as there will be play earlier on, and the error/discrepancies can be made up with slots and the like.
I just think that if I try to get the anchor bolts as they were in the original building location, they would never match up close enough, and there would be problems then for field fit-up
Thanks for the comments/suggestions
DRW
I've got a project whereby I am relocating an existing building to a new location. It seemed to me the best way to do this is to pour the foundations(and piers) without anchor bolts, and then match-drill the concrete once the columns are in place via crane as required. I just wanted to make sure that there weren’t any big issues with this... I've called out chemical anchors which are sized as are needed, but from a construction feasibility point of view, what would be a big downfall with this way of setting columns?
For a new construct, I would call out standard anchor bolts as there will be play earlier on, and the error/discrepancies can be made up with slots and the like.
I just think that if I try to get the anchor bolts as they were in the original building location, they would never match up close enough, and there would be problems then for field fit-up
Thanks for the comments/suggestions
DRW