Dec 1, 2009 #1 unclesyd Materials Joined Aug 21, 2002 Messages 9,819 Location US Most interesting is the gain (3-4%) on existing power plants using this technology. Even if he can half that it's still a big improvement. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/11/29/clean.coal.technology/
Most interesting is the gain (3-4%) on existing power plants using this technology. Even if he can half that it's still a big improvement. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/11/29/clean.coal.technology/
Dec 4, 2009 #2 dcasto Chemical Joined Jul 7, 2001 Messages 3,570 Location US not really, the process assumes that you can not vent CO2 and that you have to have a CO2 removal unit in either case. But since CO2 is not a pollutant that must be removed, the proposed system is less efficient.
not really, the process assumes that you can not vent CO2 and that you have to have a CO2 removal unit in either case. But since CO2 is not a pollutant that must be removed, the proposed system is less efficient.