royclh
Electrical
- Apr 10, 2007
- 28
hi, due to a requirement to discharge the capacitor in between operations, the capacitor is not possible to re-use it for reactive VAR control for a period of 10 mins after the first switching in and out. Hence, the power utility claims that it does not comply to the continuous voltage control. To reduce the discharge time of capacitors to 10seconds, a discharged VT has been initially suggested to be connected along with the steps. However, my discussion with several engineers seems to suggest that the period of 10 mins "DEAD TIME" delay is NOT actually the consequence of the capacitor discharge but the spring charging of the circuit breaker. The capacitor is designed to withstand out of phase switching. Also, whether the capacitor is fully charged or discharged, it does not affect much on its VAR generation. I'm getting confused.
Can anyone enlighten me this? Is there any detailed information about the "spring charging" of the circuit breaker on the web? If this is the limitation of the circuit breaker and apparently if it's nothing we could do about it, I'm just curious how one can comply to a continuous voltage control?
Look forward to your reply. Many thanks in advance.
Can anyone enlighten me this? Is there any detailed information about the "spring charging" of the circuit breaker on the web? If this is the limitation of the circuit breaker and apparently if it's nothing we could do about it, I'm just curious how one can comply to a continuous voltage control?
Look forward to your reply. Many thanks in advance.