Dec 5, 2006 #1 cr1973 Civil/Environmental Joined Jul 30, 2003 Messages 100 Location US Anyone know the C values for 1" rubber hose, or 2" and 3" flexible hosing, commonly used on hydrant outlets? I've been assuming 90 or 100.
Anyone know the C values for 1" rubber hose, or 2" and 3" flexible hosing, commonly used on hydrant outlets? I've been assuming 90 or 100.
Dec 5, 2006 #2 bimr Civil/Environmental Joined Feb 25, 2003 Messages 9,386 Location US Typical values of c for commonly used rubber-lined hoses are as follows: Hose diameter c value 1" 150 1-1/2" 24 2" 8 The values of c for various hoses, can be found in the Fire Protection Handbook published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). http://www.msha.gov/regs/complian/ppls/2006/PPL06-V-2appendix.pdf Upvote 0 Downvote
Typical values of c for commonly used rubber-lined hoses are as follows: Hose diameter c value 1" 150 1-1/2" 24 2" 8 The values of c for various hoses, can be found in the Fire Protection Handbook published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). http://www.msha.gov/regs/complian/ppls/2006/PPL06-V-2appendix.pdf
Dec 5, 2006 1 #3 LHA Civil/Environmental Joined May 28, 2003 Messages 846 Location US Note the NFPA equation the c bimr gave is not the H-W equation. So the NFPA c does not equal the C in the H-W equation, if that is what you wanted. Engineering is the practice of the art of science - Steve Upvote 0 Downvote
Note the NFPA equation the c bimr gave is not the H-W equation. So the NFPA c does not equal the C in the H-W equation, if that is what you wanted. Engineering is the practice of the art of science - Steve
Dec 6, 2006 Thread starter #4 cr1973 Civil/Environmental Joined Jul 30, 2003 Messages 100 Location US Sorry, I should have been more clear - I am looking for the Hazen Williams C value. Anyone have a rough idea, am I pretty close using a c of 100? Upvote 0 Downvote
Sorry, I should have been more clear - I am looking for the Hazen Williams C value. Anyone have a rough idea, am I pretty close using a c of 100?
Dec 6, 2006 #5 bimr Civil/Environmental Joined Feb 25, 2003 Messages 9,386 Location US C=100 for rubber hose is probably a conservative value and hardly think that anyone would second guess you for that. Upvote 0 Downvote
C=100 for rubber hose is probably a conservative value and hardly think that anyone would second guess you for that.
Dec 7, 2006 #6 blueoak Civil/Environmental Joined Mar 15, 2006 Messages 197 Location US I have seen values of 130 that correspond with manufacturer friction loss tables, a little higher than probably occurs with an older hose. Upvote 0 Downvote
I have seen values of 130 that correspond with manufacturer friction loss tables, a little higher than probably occurs with an older hose.