Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Black Locust Design Values

Status
Not open for further replies.

XR250

Structural
Jan 30, 2013
5,970
I have an Arch. that wants to use 2x Black Locust for decking. My job is to figure out how far we can span it with Assembly loads. The info on the internet is pretty slim. I found this:

Gives the MOR of 19.4 ksi. Does anyone know how to convert that to an allowable bending stress?

Thanks!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

XR250....Check Chapter 4 of The Wood Handbook. Available online at following link....

Chapter 4
 
Thanks Ron,

That gives me the same ol' 19.4 ksi value. Looks like there is a factor of safety of about 5.0 on the values based on what I use for pine. I may just use 3 ksi. Serviceability may control anyway
The decking is a literally 4 inches off the ground on sleepers so I don't know that I really should worry about strength :>
 
XR250....MR is fb at ultimate failure, so I don't see an issue with using the pine values or with using the ratio of pine values (MR for pine relative to allowable fb for pine).
 
I don't have the design values for you to use, but I can tell you that black locust is multiples of the strength of any softwood used to produce decking and showing in any set of tables. It's harder, stronger, and tougher. Anyone milling oak would tell you that red oak is softer and weaker and white oak is comparable if they did a comparison, but the toughness is in a completely other realm. I don't know how that translates into allowable stresses, but I'd have no qualms using D-fir or Larch values and being confident that it was very conservative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor