Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

bent anchor bolts

Status
Not open for further replies.

doka1

Structural
Jan 7, 2009
66
I am a foreman for a concrete contractor on a 5 story steel structure building. The steel is being erected with 3/4" f1554 gr 55 anchor bolts. During the installation of the underground plumbing the plumbing contractor bent several anchor bolts. Of course bolts were bent to different degrees, one was sheared about 2 inches from the base, 3 were bent to the ground (runover), and about 10 were just bent. Having delivered the project with all anchor bolts intact, our position as always in such situations, is that it is not our responsibility for the repair of the bolts. We further expressed to GC that in such situations there are a number of repair procedures that must and should be followed. Without further information from the EOR we could not proceed on correcting the situation.

The GC did as we suggested and submitted an rfi regarding the situation, and added in the rfi the suggested fix was to core the bolts and epoxy new anchors as the anchor bolts are in fact in the right location. The EOR's replied agreed with the suggested repair and stated that any bolt bent any more than 45 degrees should be cored and epoxied.

When asked to begin work on the repair we reviewed with the GC the potential problems with such a procedure. The inability to oversize the core more than 1.5" and damaging rebar as some are in pedestals. Nonetheless, the work was started. Before coring any bolt we attempted to straighten each bolt. We did not apply any heat, and bent only about 5 degrees at a time, with rests between each bend slight bend of the rod. We were able to straighten out 11 of 14 bolts, and none of which showed signs of stress or cracks from being bent.
The GC would still like to see all the bolts the be cored and epoxied as they do not want to the deviate from the EOR direction. I stressed my concerns that we may be doing more harm than good by replacing all the bolts considering some stirrups and column steel may be cut during coring. Furthermore, all bolts are 3/4" which are typically for erection purposes only, so is it really necessary to go to such lengths. It does seem odd that a 5 story building to have only 3/4" anchor bolts, but I must mention the building does have a lot of steel bracing, this certainly has something to do with the sizing of the rods, correct?

In summary, I am just looking for some feedback on whether or not bolts bent more than 45 degrees can be salvaged. I understand that there are a lot of variable to determine whether or not this is possible, ie whether or not the bolt is in tension.

My issue is that the GC is taking an easy approach to the engineer's direction. I dont feel the engineer has fully analyzed the situation and understands the consequences or the feasibility of the repair. I feel the GC should suggest another option like welding (is that ok on f1554 gr 55?, or even offsetting a hole in the baseplate.

Your comments are appreciated!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Because of the frequency of this type of incident, it would be prudent to specify weldable steel anchor bolts in all projects so that repair can be carried out relatively easily.

It would also be prudent for the GC to protect the anchor bolts from construction traffick which may bend the bolts.

BA
 
BA, they tried to pin the protection on us...we use traffic dilineators and drums during our construction.

I think the moral of the thread here for all of you engineers is be careful what you suggest. In this case certain persons in the project want to proceed even though they know problems can arise from the procedure. It is unfortunate that it is construction101, always cover your a$$ and be ready to be able to blame someone else. My company and myself usually try to take the high road and look out for the project as a whole, as you could see I could have easily passed the buck on this one. If i didn't take the high road i could potentially be pouring slabs on deck in winter conditions!! see why it pays to take the high road.

And while I often read a lot of contractor bashing here, there are some contractors that care about their work and are truly professionals. They are experienced, and with an equally talented engineer, can deliver a great product.

Connectegr-you are correct re500 is allowed for cored holes while hy150 is not...had to bring that to everyone's attention too, otherwise hy150 would be installed according to procedure.

I did suggest they explore the options listed in design guide 1 and let me know if they will represent this to the engineer.
 
And I suggest that you learn how to communicate and work with your GC so that the method you actually prefer is on the first RFI. Contrary to what you contractors think, EOR's really do want to work with you and not cause unneeded hardship. Heck, most of us are afraid that we missed some minor detail that will come back as a change order and bite us, so it's best to maintain a positive relationship. You stated you preferred the coring method in the RFI, and the EOR said it was fine. Now you're calling him out because you dont like it?? Sounds like a problem between you and the GC.
 
There is no WPS for welding anchor bolts, some agency will not allow a welding fix. Just an FYI
 
Thanks sandman... didn't know that... never experienced the problem of not being able to weld these. My Drawing notes clearly stipulate that anchor rods be weldable.

Dik
 
Refer to Design Guide 21. There is a section on special weld cases, which includes extending anchor bolts and shows a couple of details. The WPS may not be prequalified, but this can be done per AWS.

 
Sorry, I should put my thoughts all together before hitting the enter key.

Most contractors that deal with anchor bolts have needed to weld extensions or make repairs. Therefore a WPS should be included in their QC paperwork.

 
I have yet to see a contractor have a WPS for extending rods, none have wanted to make a WPS and test it. I don't make the rules some agencies want to enforce, I do my best to read the winds, on thing I have done is try and convince them that a anchor bolt is just like a rebar, wink wink AWS D1.4. I like to warn the contractor that it might be an issue and any delay or cost to repair is there responsibility.
 
Thanks to both Sandman and connectegr for the information; I wasn't aware of these issues...

Dik
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor