Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Base expander for timber pile
- Thread starter IFRs
- Start date
SlideRuleEra
Structural
To increase point bearing capacity, I don't think so. Pile tips such as these
are used to help penetrate hard soils (Arrowhead type) or to keep the wood from "brooming" (Boot type) when the pile is driven to hard rock.
One answer, of course, would be to specify larger piles. A specification for piles usually calls out the tip diameter, diameter 3 feet from the butt, length (often in 5 foot increments), and (if needed) preservative treatment type & quantity (pounds per cubic foot, retention).
An expensive "trick" would be to specify piles longer that needed, then cut off the small diameter end before driving.
A more cost effective "trick", if the soils are right (soft) AND your Geotech Engineer approves, is to drive the piles upside-down (butt down - tip up). Not often done, but will work under the proper conditions - got to have point bearing, though. The reverse taper is great for resisting uplift but not worth 2 cents for providing any skin friction capacity for "down" loading. May also have to look at the pile as an essentially unsupported column, subject to buckling under load.
![[idea]](/data/assets/smilies/idea.gif "[idea] [idea]")
are used to help penetrate hard soils (Arrowhead type) or to keep the wood from "brooming" (Boot type) when the pile is driven to hard rock.
One answer, of course, would be to specify larger piles. A specification for piles usually calls out the tip diameter, diameter 3 feet from the butt, length (often in 5 foot increments), and (if needed) preservative treatment type & quantity (pounds per cubic foot, retention).
An expensive "trick" would be to specify piles longer that needed, then cut off the small diameter end before driving.
A more cost effective "trick", if the soils are right (soft) AND your Geotech Engineer approves, is to drive the piles upside-down (butt down - tip up). Not often done, but will work under the proper conditions - got to have point bearing, though. The reverse taper is great for resisting uplift but not worth 2 cents for providing any skin friction capacity for "down" loading. May also have to look at the pile as an essentially unsupported column, subject to buckling under load.
A 15,000 ft-lb hammer would split an upside down pile in most cases unless predrilled, which contractors hate to do. I would specify a class B timber pile and add piles as necessary to meet the load requirements.
I'm driving Class 0.8 CCA treated timber piles (L=40') now at a site in Norco, Louisiana and the actual tips are on the order of 9 to 12 inches. Butts are up to 18" diameter and need to be trimmed to fit in hood of hammer. (Southern Pine Piles). For your info on a job that has about 1000 piles add about $550 for each additional pile.
I'm driving Class 0.8 CCA treated timber piles (L=40') now at a site in Norco, Louisiana and the actual tips are on the order of 9 to 12 inches. Butts are up to 18" diameter and need to be trimmed to fit in hood of hammer. (Southern Pine Piles). For your info on a job that has about 1000 piles add about $550 for each additional pile.
- Thread starter
- #5
- Status
Similar threads
