MR168- I would agree with you if the question was about qualifying a WPS using a PJP joint detail. Based on the title, I assumed the original qualification was CJP, in which case Table 4.5 variable 31 (in the 2006 edition I'm looking at right now) should govern, which says "qualification of any CJP groove weld qualifies for any groove detail conforming to the requirements of 3.12 or 3.13" 3.12 is for PJP joint details. That would be my opinion anyway, but I'll give you that AWS D1.1 is not definitive in many areas for requirements that seem to conflict, including deletion of one process from the qualified CJP weld, as the original poster inquired about. It seems to be entirely silent on that matter, so would probably need referred to the engineer of record.