automatic2,
Unfortunately in North America the word "engineer" is not properly used in all instances. It should be a title similar to the Dipl.-Ing. title used in Europe so that one has a reasonable expectation of a person's education, work experience, etc. However, there are many people given the title engineer in North America (especially in the fields of Quality and Manufacturing/Processing) that do not have a formal background in engineering, meaning secondary education at an accredited university, membership in professional societies, professional development training, etc. And before anyone starts a discussion on the benefit of hands-on experience, how poor the current generation of university graduates are, the large number of truly gifted technical people without engineering degrees, etc., I understand all this. My point is specifically about the title, and how it should be used.