I have this PDF on my hard drive which I really like. My question is- is it legit? Are the values conservative or less so? Have they changed since? Can this be used in real world T&D engineering?
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Ampacities for Aluminum Overhead Electrical Conductors 1
- Thread starter Mbrooke
- Start date
ElectricRob
Electrical
A previous utility that I worked for built several 115 kV lines using 959 ACSS-TW. These were all either radial lines to distribution substations or were normally-open loops.
Prior to switching over to the ACSS-TW, we used 795 ACSR as our standard transmission conductor but determined that the ACSS would greatly increase our ampacity in an emergency (when we would happily accept additional line losses). The new conductor used essentially the same structure design as the ACSR, so the bottom line cost differential wasn't really all that much - the difference was limited to the cost of the conductor itself and of hardware that could handle higher temperatures.
Prior to switching over to the ACSS-TW, we used 795 ACSR as our standard transmission conductor but determined that the ACSS would greatly increase our ampacity in an emergency (when we would happily accept additional line losses). The new conductor used essentially the same structure design as the ACSR, so the bottom line cost differential wasn't really all that much - the difference was limited to the cost of the conductor itself and of hardware that could handle higher temperatures.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Question
- Locked
- Question