Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Aesthetic of Construction Joints - Pylon

Status
Not open for further replies.

Portergeist

Structural
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
3
I have been requested to assess the aesthetic acceptability of a construction proposal for construction joints between every stay location of a pylon.

I am wondering is a construction joint halfway between each stay location(1.5m c/c) is too much. Or am I being over cautious.

Obviously we will be insisting on property prepared joint surfaces and satisfactory design. I am concerned more about the aesthetics. Have you any thoughts/advise on merit of visible construction joints?
 
For something like this which does not affect structural integrity, I would just do what the responsible "aesthetic expert" wants. I might have an opinion, but usually no one cares what the structural person thinks about aesthetics.

You do not necessarily need a CJ at each location. The same look could be formed.

In the absense of an "aesthetic expert", I might say that the horizontal scoring between each cable connection looks pretty cool.

 
Thanks Graybeach,

This is a rare time where the structural person has been asked to make a call on the aesthetics!

I note that it's a positive from you. And correct the CJ does not necessarily need to be there. We could insist on less cj's if it was aesthetically merited.

Looking for comments..



 
graybeach seemed to understand your question, but I don't know what I'm looking at. What sort of "pylon" and "stay" are you talking about? Is that a plan view or elevation?
 
Hi Hokie

It's a rough sketch of a front elevation on the pylon.

The construction lines are the locations of the the proposed Construction joints. The round holes are the stays, as in the approximate cable stay locations.

 
Ah, I think I get the picture now. It is a pylon on a cable stayed bridge. Why didn't you say that?

I would think you would want as few construction joints as possible, but then I'm not a bridge engineer.
 
You can have a CJ without the horizontal groove, and you can have horizontal groove without a CJ. With all the stuff that needs to be installed to support the cable, the contractor might want a CJ between cables, but he might not want it exactly half way between.

I would leave the CJ location to the contractor, and specify grooving based on aesthetics. I've seen more vertical grooving than horizontal on cable stay towers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top