as an RTP-1 certificate holder and a memeber of both ASME RTP-1 and ASME Section X i must reply and dispel some of the misconceptions of cost.
first Acrylic is not one of the materials recognized for construction of vessels to ASME RTP-1. there is a section for dual laminates - thermoplastic liner with reinforced thermoset plastic structural. Section X is very similar on materials except that other materials and construction is allowed if certain testing is performed to "prove" the design to be safe for the intended service.
second the equipment is not "expensive" when you consider safety and documentation. equipment designed, built, inspected, and stamped to either of these ASME documents provides the end user with documented and accepted design, construction, testing, and inspection that the equipment meets specified criteria within the respective documents. Other standards governing the design, construction, inspection, and testing of RTP equipment are voluntary and do not requrie third party oversight for compliance. you get what you pay for.
since the ASME RTP-1 standard is relatively new (introduced in 1989) there are many misconceptions about its use and cost. there are many companies that require stamped equipment and governing bodies are starting to require stamped equipment for specific applications within their jurisdiction.
for your specific application i would suggest contacting the various certificate holders (you can find them on the ASME web site
and conveying your application and requirements for this equipment.
please feel free to contact me with any questions at dxk@viatec.com
thank you