Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ACI 350 - when did it originate? 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

JAE

Structural
Joined
Jun 27, 2000
Messages
15,730
Location
US
Looking for the beginning date of ACI 350, “Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures". Did it exist in the 1960's?

Specifically - what would an engineer have used or depended on in the 1960's for a design of a water containing tank?...besides his/her wits of course.

 
ACI Committee 350 was organized in 1964. I don't have anything that tells me what the document evolution was.
 
The earliest archived 350 material on ACI's website is 1993.

Would the requirement for higher temp. reinforcement be there in the 60's?

 
I checked with one of the guys on the committee in our firm. His answer;
"The oldest ACI 350 committee report I have is 1971. There may be older committee reports that I don’t have. I also have a copy of a 1989 committee report. The general design approach goes back a long time.
The first ACI 350 Code document is 2001. The current Code is 2006. We are currently working on an updated code, but I expect it is still a year or two away from being published."
 
Jede:

Is there an address/contact to send comments to?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

 
JAE...prior to the 2001 "Standard", it is likely that a similar "Recommended Practice" document existed, since the committee has been in place for quite some time. I'm out of town but will check older versions of the ACI Manual of Practice for such when I get back in.

It is likely that designers used ACI 318, AWWA and PCA guidelines before the ACI standard was developed. I did tank design in the 70's by AWWA standards, but those were mostly steel. When we did concrete design I'm pretty sure it was only AWWA, PCA and 318.

Check with Charles Hanskat of Hanskat Consulting in Chicago. He has been doing this for over 35 years.
 
Mike, if you have a comment, I would send it to:
ACI Managing Director of Engineering
P.O. Box 9094
Farmington Hills, MI 48333.
I'd ask for an acknowledgement that it was received.
 
Per the attached link
"History of Tank’s Seismic Design
Analytical studies were undertaken in the late 1940s through the early 1960s by Jacobsen at Stanford and Housner at Cal-Tech. Lydik Jacobsen, under a grant from the U. S. Navy, analyzed the dynamic forces exerted by a fluid on the inside of a cylindrical tank and on the outside of a cylindrical pier. The two cases are similar from a theoretical standpoint. This analysis was then used both for the design of tanks and for submerged piers or caissons in a marine environment.
By analyzing what he called impulsive hydrodynamic forces of fluids, he derived graphs from which values for the "effective" mass of the fluid could be obtained for various height-to-diameter ratios. This "effective" mass then had an appropriate seismic force factor applied to it to obtain the seismic shear. The method was still in use by many engineers well into the 1980s. It is interesting to compare his findings with current practice.
After the 1964 Alaska earthquake, a major study was made of tank failures which resulted in the basic methodology, as described above, for the linear static procedure still in use. In the late 60s, analytical studies began to appear in the literature by Veletsos and others who attempted to provide a theoretical framework to account for actual vessel behavior during earthquakes. This has continued to the present date with more sophisticated studies that attempt to predict behavior with varying combinations of shell thickness, foundation and soil interaction characteristics. However, a general procedure has not yet appeared."

Garth Dreger PE - AZ Phoenix area
As EOR's we should take the responsibility to design our structures to support the components we allow in our design per that industry standards.
 
 http://www.structuremag.org/article.aspx?articleID=446
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top