I had a slide rule back in about 1973. Never did learn how to use it. Thank goodness that pocket calculators came on the market about the same time that I entered university. But I think I had to pay about $600. for my first calculator!!
Do I detect some canadian-engineer criticism above. Having reviewed many designs by both US and Canadian engineers I have found sub-standard designs originating from both countries. In Toronto and Montreal the major problem is poor maintenance of reinforced concrete structures deteriorating...
If you do end up going with custom bolts, you could reduce the required head and nut size by coutersinking them both, if the existing steel thicknesses will allow.
After Corn's comment about "wanting to see it erected", it got me to thinking about how few times I have witnessed erection of my designs (actually 0 in 28 years!!!). Do others have the same problem that they can never afford to get out of the office?
I don't see why the lateral support requirements are any different for vertical vs battered piles. Both are subject to axial load and probably flexure.
cage
In regions subject to snowfall, the curved top flange serves to reduce the impact from snowplow blades. Where the top flange is not curved, it is advisable to construct snowplow deflectors on the abutments.
cage
By "relative stiffness of the members" I think that they mean "relative stiffness of the substructures. i.e a tall slender pier would provide less resistance to longitudinal force than a short stubby pier.