Let's try this again , let's establish axis., y, x , and z. Z would be direction of the axis. Axis w would be rotating of the entire part. Are want to rotate ot move in the z axis?
4 jaw chucks are great, if in good condition.
Each jaw can move independently. There fore adjust and true up the casting. Inside collet really depends the length and diameter size of the part.
Hope fully they are boring and facing simultaneously. This will true up to each other.
If there is an...
There is no added value to redesign existing flanges. And the reason is as posted by above of all post. This is standard reliable practice.
Stick to what works and not deviate.
Really making this more complicated than it needs to be.
My recommendation is to dimension the slot
Width x depth , 8x equally spaced and be done with it, and dimension to assemble.
You could depict true position xxx 8x
Equally spaced
I was puzzled. The intent of a bellows is to allow moment. I worked with lox fuel lines on the atlas centaur. And the reason for the bellows was to have slight movement from vibration, Prevent failure from cracking the joints.
So I was confused why the bolts.
Little inch cleared that up.
Use combination of ultrasonic inspection device.
Measure the wall thickness, in the surrounding area not having corrosion. Take hand grinder remove one small area with deep corrosion.
Measure with pin depth mic . Inspect the difference. Then decide
Here are some standard practices. Depending on the type of manufacturing.
For machined parts guide
Standard internal radii .015-.040 R
Standard edge break .005-.025
Standard linear dimensions ÷/-.005, ÷/-.010 +/-.020.
Reason is tolerance stack up. During manufacturing to achieve final drawing...
I agree with Dave's and your thoughts on AI.
But not all books all equally. I could make a spread sheet from 45 years of experience as a guide. How ever it would be obsolete in short
Time. When I started. I used manual machines.
Manual engine lathe, manual turret lathe,
Hand operated OD and ID...
Well he could have said that instead of attacking me. This was actually observation fron actual homes destroyed in that fire. 100% of those homes failed is a fact. Not some theory.
That was why I made that comment. Actual observed failed concrete. Now I am ready to move on . End of discussion.