Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Older Domestic Diesel Engines vs. Newer Domestic Diesel Engines

Older Domestic Diesel Engines vs. Newer Domestic Diesel Engines

Older Domestic Diesel Engines vs. Newer Domestic Diesel Engines

I'm thinking of getting a 1990 GMC 3500 Box Van that has a
6.2 litre diesel engine in it.  I was warned by my neighbor that any domestic diesel engine before about 1996 or so had lots of problems.  Any input on this would be greatly appreciated.  

Thank you,

RE: Older Domestic Diesel Engines vs. Newer Domestic Diesel Engines

Billyg, this may not be much help, but the company had a 1990 Suburban, 4 wheel drive, 6.2 engine.  It was , in the beginning, rather gutless.  Problem cured with the installation of a Banks Turbo Kit (circa $3000) .  The next thing that came up was it was overly sensitive to water condensation in the fuel.  Problem solved with add on water seperator and filter. Aside form that, it performed ok for several years untill the owner traded for a Dodge.


RE: Older Domestic Diesel Engines vs. Newer Domestic Diesel Engines


I rebuilt a chev deisel but first looked into all this. Someone rudely suggested to me that GM seem to have a habit of building granades, then progressively improving them to become very good engines. THey did this with the 5.7 which was just rubbish in my humble opinion in 1979 version,but by 1994 was a pretty good engine. Looked the same but numerous modified like the journals, small ends, piston lands, crank, confods, heads. There was a similar thing with the two series in the 6.2. Yu should contact the engine rebuilders. With my late version 5.7 I rebuilt it like I was building a race engine - balanced, line bored, decked, bump heights, check grind and fit on crank, etc etc. It runs like a petrol, totally smooth.

RE: Older Domestic Diesel Engines vs. Newer Domestic Diesel Engines

I concur with Rod. The 6.2 was a stout engine, but it needs a turbo. The normally aspirated ones have no grunt. We used them for service vehicles - empty; okay, loaded or with a trailer; thought someone left the anchor out. I had a '81 Olds - most of the early bugs were gone. It needed a water separator, the first injection pump went at 45,000 (covered by 50k emission warranty), I knew the second would be mine. Started at 0 degrees, ran 32 mpg on the road fully loaded, able to squeal the tires and light up troopers radar. Wife made my sell it after it dropped the turbo 200M transmission all over the street. (See squeal the tires, etc.) Unlike the 5.7, the 6.2 was designed as a diesel, just needs more power (torque).


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close