×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Steel link beam embeded in shearwalls

Steel link beam embeded in shearwalls

Steel link beam embeded in shearwalls

(OP)
I recently saw an embeded steel link beam design that used the method described in PCI design handbook 5th edition, section 6.9 Structural Steel Haunches, where it resolved the applied moment into two compression zones on top and bottom flanges (bearing on concrete).  Simply, the bearing forces (one near the face of the concrete shear wall, and the other at the end of the steel link beam) separated by the moment arm resists the applied moment.  

I also saw an example of an embeded steel link beam design where the applied moment was resolved into top and bottom flanges of the beam as compression and tension forces, which were then resolved into the shear wall through a number of studs.  Here, the pull out force of the concrete was checked on the tension side of the linkbeam.  Also, the web of the beam did not extend the full length of the flanges but only a short way into the shear wall, enough to take the shear force in the beam.  

The main difference between the two was that the method described by PCI decreased the embeded length of the link beam but the vertical (shear and bearing) load on the web of the linkbeam was greater.  On the other hand, the method utilizing the studs had large embedment length to develop enough pullout strength in the concrete and to accommodate the number of required studs, but the shear force in the beam was less.

I was wondering, which one of these methods are widely used in the industry, and if both of them are used equally often, when and where should each method be utilized to optimize the design.  In a highrise, I would think the large link beam forces (both moment and shear) would be significant in determining the construction of the link beams depending on the method chosen.

Thanks.

ktny

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Simulation-Driven Design with SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now
eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close