×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, & conventional STABILIZERS usage.

? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, & conventional STABILIZERS usage.

? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, & conventional STABILIZERS usage.

(OP)
What are the determining factor that a designer uses to determine which tail configuration they use. I understand the reasons for the "T-tail configuration" when used with rear engined aircraft.  Some examples of the different configurations in use are:

The Dassault FALCON 50, 90, 900, 2000 and FX all utilize the middle span ANHEDRAL style stabilizer, the FALCON 20, however, uses the slightly DIHEDRAL mid-span stabilizer.  CITATION II, V, 500, and 550's all use a DIHEDRAL configuration.  LEARJETS use the T-tail configuration exclusively, the HAWKER-SIDDELY 125 use a T-tail configurtion, and the anachronistic WESTWIND uses what looks like, a low conventional stabilizer.  Any explaination on the positive and negatives of each configurations would be great.  Thanks everyone.       
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: ? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, & conventional STABILIZERS usage.

A full answer is long and involved.  It may help to shorten the answer if you would say why are you asking.

RE: ? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, & conventional STABILIZERS usage.

(OP)
No specific reasons really, I just want to know if there is a criteria that dictates a particular choice. Any links to books that could provide in-depth explanations would be great as well.  Thanks    

RE: ? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, & conventional STABILIZERS usage.

Usually the boss likes one configuration or another.  The design always starts there.  I remember a light twin design where the President of the company wanted the tail to look like the tail on the F-5.  We just about never got that to work right.

The tail's vertical placement is a tradeoff between aesthetics, tail arm, and desired distance from the propwash or jet engine exhaust.

T-tails sometimes have anhedral because that was an early solution to dynamic cross-coupling in flutter problems.  T-tails don’t seem to always have anhedral anymore.

Other than that, dihedral or anhedral is usually added to a tail after wind tunnel tests in order to tailor the roll/yaw characteristics of the airplane.

RE: ? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, & conventional STABILIZERS usage.

(OP)
Thanks Miper, that makes sense to me now.  I appreciate your reply.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close