Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
(OP)
At out company, we usually specify SAE J403 as the reference spec for mild steels and SAE J2340 for HSLA steels. The problem I see, is that J403 is a chemical compostion spec and the equivalent spec for alloy steels would be J404. Similarily J2340 is mechanical (mostly) and J2329 would be equivalent for low carbon steels.
But each of these (J403 vs J2329, or J404 vs J2340) appear to refer to different grades (different grade systems, even).
When we choose materials for our designs, it is usually based on mechanical properties such as yield strength and UTS, not chemical composition.
We use sheet steel and coil steel, and I learned that until recently we were using mechanical properties from J1397 which is a bar stock spec.
To make things worse, we also use steel HREW tubing, and SAE doesn't even have a spec for that so we ask for HREW SAE J-something, but I think the tube mills all use ASTM for there specs!!!!!
How do I straighten this all out!!!???
Thanks,
Jeff
But each of these (J403 vs J2329, or J404 vs J2340) appear to refer to different grades (different grade systems, even).
When we choose materials for our designs, it is usually based on mechanical properties such as yield strength and UTS, not chemical composition.
We use sheet steel and coil steel, and I learned that until recently we were using mechanical properties from J1397 which is a bar stock spec.
To make things worse, we also use steel HREW tubing, and SAE doesn't even have a spec for that so we ask for HREW SAE J-something, but I think the tube mills all use ASTM for there specs!!!!!
How do I straighten this all out!!!???
Thanks,
Jeff
RE: Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
The specs for steel are annoying, a yar and a half ago a customer ordered steel and told the salesman they wanted 1010... well they ment Steel to ASTM A1010-00 Spec which is similar to J403 (covers all the CR steels IIRC) wow what a mess.
again good luck!
nick
Nick
I love materials science!
RE: Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
Next, do not use SAE J1397 for estimating mechanical properties of sheet steel grades. As you know, this standard is for steel bars, and therefore not appropriate for sheet steels. Unfortunately, there is no equivalent SAE guide for mechanical properties of flat rolled steels. The best place to obtain this information is from the steel supplier, but handbooks like ASM HANDBOOK Volume 1 or Automotive Steel Design Manual (http://www.a-sp.org/database/default.asp?doc=28) also have some data.
And lastly, SAE does have some tubing standards (J525, etc.) but they do not cover the entire range of tubing available. ASTM standards are used most frequently by tube manufacturers, and they reference SAE grades like 1010, 1020, etc. ASTM A 512, 513, and 519 are just a few that cover steel tubes. I recommend you investigate these standards further (tolerances, mechanical property requirements, testing requirements, etc.).
I hope this was somewhat useful. Feel free to post again if you have additional questions.
RE: Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
RE: Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
Dent Resistant Non-Bake-Hardenable
Dent Resistant Bake-Hardenable
High Strength Solution Strengthened
High Strength Low Alloy
High Strength Recovery Annealed
Ultra High Strength Dual Phase
Ultra High Strength Low Carbon Martensite
Each one of these categories has requirements for chemical composition and mechanical properties. If you have a question about a specific grade, feel free to post again. If you need the entire standard, you can obtain it from the SAE website:
http://www.sae.org
RE: Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
Thanks,
Gary
RE: Confusion betwen SAE Steel Specs (J series)
Regarding compositions, CS Type B has more variability than SAE 1010. The carbon content of the former can be 0.02-0.15 vs. 0.08-0.13 for the latter. Also, the Mn content of CS Type B is listed as a maximum of 0.60 instead of a range of 0.30-0.60 for 1010. Wider variations in chemical composition will allow for more variation in mechanical properties and formability. If this is a concern for your application, then you should do some further investigation such as reviewing historical data on the 1010, possibly performing formability analysis on your parts, and definitely discuss potential variation with your stamping supplier.