In the past, variable spped control of small chemical feed pumps has been done using DC drives. Lately, we're seeing more AFDs used with standard induction motors. Does anyone have any feelings regarding which of these technologies is more appropriate for chemical feed? DC drives required more maintenance with respect to brush replacement and the related need to stock spare DC motors which were more expensive. I'd appreciate any insight on where the technology is headed now.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Many manufacturers rely on a product data management (PDM) system that once met their basic data management needs. As they expand their business and develop more complex products, they find their system falls short. Download the guide to find out how to meet your needs with PLM. Download Now
Beating out competitors, PTC has taken the number one spot to earn the Product Leadership Award 2019 from Frost & Sullivan. This award is given to North American PLM solution providers for excellence in digital transformation particularly with discrete manufacturing. Download Now
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicleâ€™s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now