In the past, variable spped control of small chemical feed pumps has been done using DC drives. Lately, we're seeing more AFDs used with standard induction motors. Does anyone have any feelings regarding which of these technologies is more appropriate for chemical feed? DC drives required more maintenance with respect to brush replacement and the related need to stock spare DC motors which were more expensive. I'd appreciate any insight on where the technology is headed now.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Engineers are being asked to produce more sophisticated designs under a perfect storm of complexity, cost, and change management pressures. Generative design empowers automotive design teams to navigate this storm by employing automation, data re-use and synchronization, and framing design in the context of a full vehicle platform. Download Now
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, weâ€™ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now
Aberdeenâ€™s survey of 100 top executives reveals how discrete manufacturers can ensure quality in complex, innovative engineering environments. Download this report for an exploration of how to best implement quality control in manufacturing. Download Now
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now