Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
(OP)
I've noticed in Means and my cost estimating database that there are L type and J type anchor bolts? What's the difference between the two?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting Guidelines |
|
Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.
Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:
Register now while it's still free!
Already a member? Close this window and log in.
RE: Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
RE: Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
Thank you, thank you, you are a great audience. But seriously folks, other than expansion, what are the pros/cons of them? The only thing I see is the J type would be hook the rebar and maybe take more up lift, but once the conc. cures I don't see how the L type would be any different from the J type.
RE: Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
RE: Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
RE: Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
Using a straight bolt with a plate on the end develops a good shear cone and high strength, provided they are placed such that the reinforcing steel intersects the stress development area.
Expansion bolts are designed so that when loaded (pre-load is required for seating during installation), a sleeve or wedge device will be pushed outward against the concrete as the bolt is being pulled upward by the load. The bolts don't actually expand, the design of the bolt device just re-orients the load. Works opposite the "Chinese Finger Puzzle".
Hey Qshake....whereya been?? Glad you're back.
RE: Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
RE: Anchor Bolts... J vs. L ?
1. Shear Cone as haynewp has said.
2. Threaded/ welded connection between the head and the bolt, if any.
3. Bearing stress directly under the head of bolt (or plate in Ron's post)as this stress will probably govern the design.
Providing the bond length is simpler and more easy in contrast. No?