×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

How do you quantify minor inclusions on the boring logs?

How do you quantify minor inclusions on the boring logs?

How do you quantify minor inclusions on the boring logs?

(OP)
How do you guys use to quantify inclusions such as organics (roots, leaves, branches), debris (brick, concrete, asphalt, metal, trash, etc.)? FHWA guidelines use "with," which does not quantify to paint a picture of the amount of inclusions encountered

RE: How do you quantify minor inclusions on the boring logs?



For organics you can use the above. For MADE GROUND I have only very really encoutered fragments of material that indicates its not natural soil, fragments of red brick, tarmac etc.

But if I did encounter ground that included 'a lot' of fragments of non natural soil then I would just try be as descriptive as possible, eg 25% of soil made up of 2mm dia fragments of red brick with approximately 5% made up of plastic pieces

RE: How do you quantify minor inclusions on the boring logs?

This is when modified Burmister comes in handy. I know it's not used nearly as much as USCS, but it has its advantages.

and = 35%-50%
some = 20%-35%
little = 10%-20%
trace = 0%-10%

trace, little, or some (+) = on the higher end of trace, little, or some.
trace, little, or some (-) = on the lower end of trace, little, or some.

UCSC does allow for use of estimated percentages, which conflict with Burmister, and I have rarely seen used in practice but are included in ASTM D2488:

Trace—Particles are present but estimated to be less than 5 %
Few—5 to 10 %
Little—15 to 25 %
Some—30 to 45 %
Mostly—50 to 100 %

In all of the examples provided in ASTM, they provide approximate percentages in the sub description, which I have rarely seen used as well:
Silty Sand with Organic Fines (SM)—About 75 % fine to coarse, hard, subangular reddish sand; about 25 % organic and silty dark brown nonplastic fines with no dry strength and slow dilatancy; wet; maximum size, coarse sand; weak reaction with HCl.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close