Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pullout boxes - shear capacities 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just Some Nerd

Just Some Nerd

Structural
Jul 25, 2022
261
Hi guys, having a little bit of a wonder regarding calculation of shear capacities of the reo in a pullout box is (for use in a jumpform application). Looking at manufacture's design guides are bit odd to me - for example Reid's design guide seems to dip into AS4100 bolt/pin connections by including the 0.62 factor seen in clauses 9.2.2.1 and 9.4.1, but with a phi of 0.6 which seems to come from AS3600 for fixing. I've also heard of using phi = 0.36 (I think a doubling up of 0.6 from AS3600 and some other clause regarding an additional 0.6) but nobody seems to be able to point to me where that additional 0.6 is pulled from. Using 0.36 makes enough sense to me, just would like some guidance as to where numbers are being pulled from and/or why Reid seems to mix and match.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why yes, I do in fact have no idea what I'm talking about
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
"0.62 factor seen in clauses 9.2.2.1 and 9.4.1"
Do you mean
Vf = 0.62 fuf kr(nnAc + nxAo) in 9.3.2.1 and,
Vf = 0.62 fyp ns Ap in 9.5.1

This is a factor for shear distribution over a circular cross section and is not a capacity reduction factor. phi=0.8 then applies in both cases to get the design capacity.

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The 0.62 factor is to convert the ultimate tensile strength to an ultimate shear strength, it's not related to the shape of the cross-section.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
bugbus said:
The 0.62 factor is to convert the ultimate tensile strength to an ultimate shear strength, it's not related to the shape of the cross-section.
Click to expand...

Correct.

Perhaps a better way to rephrase my question is more along the lines of asking what the correct value for converting tensile yield/ultimate tensile stress for typical 500N rebar compared to the 0.62 given from the bolt grades in AS4100.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why yes, I do in fact have no idea what I'm talking about
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
For yield it should be closer to the 'theoretical' (von Mises) value of 1/sqrt(3) = 0.58, 0.6 is probably close enough.

I would not rely on the tensile strength of the reinforcement, just the yield strength.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thanks bugbus. I wasn't relying on the ultimate strength, it was just being used for 4100 is why I mentioned.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why yes, I do in fact have no idea what I'm talking about
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

li0ngalahad
  • Locked
  • Question
AS3600 Boundary elements in moderately ductile shear walls
2
Replies
29
Views
4K
li0ngalahad
li0ngalahad
dangee
  • Locked
  • Question
AS3600 - Anchorage of shear reinforcement by welding
Replies
1
Views
302
bugbus
bugbus
Legoman92
  • Locked
  • Question
AS 3600 - 2018 8.3.2.4 Anchorage of shear reinforcement
Replies
2
Views
527
Legoman92
Legoman92
sanji02
  • Locked
  • Question
NZS 9.3.9.3.4 (beam shear/1-way slab) and 12.7.2 (2-ways/punching shear)
Replies
1
Views
285
Agent666
Agent666
sanji02
  • Locked
  • Question
Two way thick slab (>750mm) and minimum shear
Replies
7
Views
597
dik
dik

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom