Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Disney Fantasmic animatronic fire

Disney Fantasmic animatronic fire

Disney Fantasmic animatronic fire

Video of the accident: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o8xN7D1cjE

What it's supposed to look like: https://youtu.be/eY2Hsl70hcg?t=60

Aftermath: https://youtu.be/eY2Hsl70hcg?t=60

Surprisingly there doesn't appear to be much damage to anything but the dragon itself and probably the platform it rises from/control systems underground in that area.

One thing I see is that when the dragon was supposed to spit fire, instead it mostly spit a cloud of smoke or possibly atomized fuel that did not ignite. Then a few seconds later there is normally a pyro shot that goes off on the head. I'm thinking that something caused the isopar fire shot to mis-fire, leaving a cloud of fuel inside the head of the dragon. Then the later pyro ignited it.

The later blast of fuel a little ways into the inferno I'm assuming was actually a high pressure hydraulic line that ruptured.

Interesting that the body of the dragon doesn't seem to be made with any flame retardant materials. I did read a thread from a former Disney fire department employee that stated that at least back in 2010 when he worked there, a fire department employee was always stationed in the building right behind the dragon and he had access to 2 fire hoses and the fuel shutoff, amongst other things. It seems to have taken a LONG time for the fire department to get to the fire based on the various videos out there.

I did see towards the end of this video that they turned the water screens back on (around 12:30 in the video), possibly as an attempt to shield the audience from anything flaming heading in their direction, like a theater fire curtain/deluge system (I used to work as a theater electrician and all theaters have a fireproof curtain and/or a deluge system that separates the audience from the stage in the event of a stage fire). I was kind of surprised they didn't do that sooner, as part of their standard procedures.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close