Mass flow of air from volumetric flow

Why sqrt(dair/dn)?

Shouldn't this just be the ratio without the square root?

Also the European comma instead of decimal point confuses me and you seem to use both, so density is 1.293, but velocity is 11,296??, not 11.296.

Also I highly doubt the 336C air is at exactly 101365 Pa. Even a small difference will make a big impact.

Then from your calc I get 1726 kg/hr.

But your original calc is wrong. fn * Dn should be 2580 kg/hr. I think you multiplied the normal air flow by the density at 300C....



Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

Thank you for the reply. Sorry about the coma/dot errors. I pasted it from excel and then edited it manually to make it easier for non-Europeans.

You are of course right abot the incorrectly calculated density. I attach the corrected excel file. This comes from the Bernulli's equation with the assumption that head is 0 (horizontal duct) and the static pressure is equal to normal pressure.

p_s+p_d+ρ⋅g⋅h=const



When I calculate it from the gas law, then it becomes simple. p*V / T = const

V_n = V_air * (P_air/P_n) * (T_n/T_air) * (Z_n/Z_air)

for simplicity Z1 = Z2 = 1

With that the flow is 1337 Nm³/hr which gives mass flow of 1728 kg/h

The question is, why Bernullis equation gives incorrect answer, but it is Probably because the change of static pressure is not considered. So in order to apply the Bernullis principle I should first always measure the actual static pressure in the duct. Right?

In that case the welocity of air recalculated to normal conditions would be:



Any thoughts on that? I would really appreciate some feedback from a person who does shuch measurements /calculations for living.

Hi,
Review the basic equations:
P*V=Z*R*T real Gas law > Qv1/Qv2= Z1*T1*P2/(Z2*T2*P1); Qv =volumetric flowrate; T, P absolute values.
1, conditions T1, P1; 2, condition (T2, P2)
Mass conservation > Qv1/Qv2= ρ2/ρ1
> As the size of the pipe is the same V1/V2=ρ2/ρ1; V = velocity
No Square root
you may want to review how the velocity is calculated using a pitot tube:

Note: Bernoulli
v1= 11.245 m/s; v2=25.11 m/s
q1=0.552 m3/s; q2=1.2326m3/s
m1=m2 =0.7109 kg/s
ρ1=1.2879 kg/m3;ρ2=0.5768 kg/m3
Z1=Z2 # 1; T1= 273.15 K, P1 = P2 = 1013 mbar, T2=t2+273.15;
EOSR
note: You may have some moisture in air.


Good luck
Pierre

Thank you Pierre. I think that now I have the right way of calculatng the flow in normal cubic meters and in kilograms per hour. I will have to follow the standard of measuring with the pitot tube, when possible (usuallly there is only 1 opening for the measuring tube)

There is another issue though, maybe connected to the moisture in air. Different duct, different condition. There is a new installation of hot air recovery from one of the oven to the another. Using hot air instead of fresh air allowes to save on gas consumption. These are lacquering ovens (they extract the solvent from the lacquer and then cure it)

d= 250mm -> A = 0,096m²
t_rec = 291°C - Temperature of exhaust gas in the duct
t_amb - 31 °C - fresh air intake

p_d - 0,2116 mbar - Average dynamic pressure (several sets of measurements)
w - 8,22 m/s - average air velocity in the duct

F = 0,791 m/s = 2848 m³/h = 1783 kg/h - flow of pre-heated air in the duct
F_n = 1379 Nm³/h - flow at normal conditions

c_p = 1026 J / kg * K - specyfic heat of air

Using the pre-heated air at 291°C instead of fresh air at 31 °C in theory is equivalent of energy saving of 476 MJ/h or 132 kW.

c_gas = 35,17 MJ/m³ - calorific value of natural gas declared by supplier

In theory this should save usin 13,522 m³/ h of natural gas, but in fact this is around 20 ( I can see it directly on the rotameter for natural gus before the burner). The difference was instatanous and remained. Also the indication on the rotaeters was stable before and after the hot air recovery on. The humidty of the air was around 80 % at that day (temp inside 30 °C, outside 15 °C ). How can I add this humidity to the heat capacity of air?



So the results are way better than in the calculation, but for the future I need to know how to calculate it properly.

BTW It is not my project, I joined when it was already starting up.

Regards,
Marcin

Hi,
Basically, you have to perform mass and Heat balances to calculate the improvement using hot air.
I've added a document related to humidity to help you out.
Note: I'm not sure that your Rota meters are the best technology for measuring your consumption of NG. You should perform your balances over a period of time to reduce the discrepancies, let say a day, a week, a month, the best way being the comparison of the monthly bill before and after the change.
Good luck
Pierre

Thank you for the support. I will try to calculate it properly. On Thursday I measurre the airflows again. Then I see if the results are consistent with the precious ones