Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
(OP)
Hello,
I'am doing a Joule heating study of a simple cable model.
The cable has a terminal of 50A in one end, and a ground in the other end.
A heat flux is added to the surface.
My problem is:
I am simulating a Stranded cable as a solid cable in comsol for time saving and mesh optimisation.
This however makes it so that the solid cable in the simulation has more copper than the real life stranded cable using the same diameter.
I want to change the simulation so that i dictacte the resistivity from the standard 1.72 e-7 to a value of my choice.
Is there a way to do this? Or should i go with another aproach to manually decide the resistance of the cable?
Right now the linearized resistivity value isn't used by COMSOL. Unless i choose linearized resistivity in the constitutive relation.
But this makes the model take 10 years to compute.
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards - Jens

I'am doing a Joule heating study of a simple cable model.
The cable has a terminal of 50A in one end, and a ground in the other end.
A heat flux is added to the surface.
My problem is:
I am simulating a Stranded cable as a solid cable in comsol for time saving and mesh optimisation.
This however makes it so that the solid cable in the simulation has more copper than the real life stranded cable using the same diameter.
I want to change the simulation so that i dictacte the resistivity from the standard 1.72 e-7 to a value of my choice.
Is there a way to do this? Or should i go with another aproach to manually decide the resistance of the cable?
Right now the linearized resistivity value isn't used by COMSOL. Unless i choose linearized resistivity in the constitutive relation.
But this makes the model take 10 years to compute.
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards - Jens


RE: Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
RE: Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
If you do want to look at transients, i.e. the real thermal conductivity and mass of the copper is important, then model the cable as multiple (straight) strands with contact at the tangent points, or perhaps even model the stands as a continuous solid chunk with appropriate voids in it to get the right ratios.
RE: Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
Thank you both for the advice, i will try looking into the solutions.
Yes btrueblood you are correct. I intend to keep the same physical parameters for the cable, so that the heat flux matches the real test stand. So my only wish is to correct the resistance of the wire.
My study intends to anticiate the temperature rise of a real life cable during a heat run with a specefic ampere value, using a COMSOL model. But so far my simple model overshoots the temperature a bit.
So far the way to make my Model match reality has been to tune in the heat transfer coeffecient in the heat flux boundary on the cable surface. e.g. raise it from 5W/m^2*K to 9W/m^2*K.
All the other parameters of the model seems to be tuned to match reality.
I have one question for the heat transfer coeffecient HTC:
If the HTC from the cable surface to air is 5W/m^2*K in an enclosed box, is this a semi constant value for htc?
Or does it change with the material type and cable arrangement.
Thank you in advance.
Kind regards - Jens
RE: Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
Thank you
RE: Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
Probably more the cable arrangement vs. material. The convection coefficient is dependent on the air flow around the cable, so blockages to air flow will make a big difference and can turn convection into conduction only, i.e., if vertical air flow is restricted, for example.
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm
RE: Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
Nothing in heat transfer is constant, LOL. And if this is natural convection (no forced air/fan) it's pretty normal to have to tweak book values to get a good correlation. As IRstuff said, the configuration of the cable, size of the box, etc. will make a difference. So will conductive heat transfer at the boundaries where the real cable is terminated.
RE: Changing the way COMSOL calculates the resistance of a conductor
Alright, thank you guys for the answers.
It's been very helpful!
Kind regards - Jens.