×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

MSC Nastran vs. NX Nastran in 2022

MSC Nastran vs. NX Nastran in 2022

MSC Nastran vs. NX Nastran in 2022

(OP)
I have been reading old posts in this forum from back in the 2004, 2005 regarding NX Nastran vs MSC Nastran capabilities. It is clear that on those times UGS had just gained access to the 2001 version of MSC Nastran original solver and started developing its own version. But what about in 2022?

Based on your opinion, which solver version is the best nowadays? Pros and cons? How is the market shared worlwide, specially in the aerospace sector? 50%/50%? Is it tied to the Pre-/Post- being used?

Is it true that more companies are nowadays using NX than MSC, because its inherent link to the a more updated GUI (like Femap or the brand new Simcenter)?

I was told MSC.Software lost several customers in the last decades due to the lack of an updated Pre/Post GUI, and its main competitor UGS/Siemens took advantage of it developing a better graphical interface. And the combo meal of course seems to be GUI+Solver purchased at once from the same software provider.

Thanks!

RE: MSC Nastran vs. NX Nastran in 2022

I used msc nastran/patran for many years, then femap more recently. I can't say too much about differences between the solvers, but regarding gui - Femap is infinitely more logically organised and intuitive than patran, which remains stuck in 1992 with numerous bandaid improvements over the top - it's a right mess. but then femap is not perfect. there are a few little things i wish femap could do ( tensor display is a bit basic, and element selection process could be streamlined, session recording language i found to be unusable), of which patran is quite capable.

RE: MSC Nastran vs. NX Nastran in 2022

Hi,

NX NASTRAN is now called SIMCENTER NASTRAN and lots of new capabilities have been brought into it since SIEMENS has incorporated LMS/SAMTECH solver solutions into it, SAMCEF for exemple.

The non linear solver for SOL601/SOL701 from external partner ADINA is phasing out/phased out and replaced by SOL401/SOL402 (SOL 401 is based on NASTRAN; SOL402 based on SAMCEF which are both SIEMENS owned/developped).

I cannot compare to MSC NASTRAN however.

FEMAP is is one UI that can access to SIMCENTER NASTRAN.

Siemens's UI is SIMCENTER 3D (a kind of fork of NX) in which PRE/POST can be done not only with SIMCENTER NASTRAN but also ANSYS, ABAQUS, MSC NASTRAN, LS-DYNA...

RE: MSC Nastran vs. NX Nastran in 2022

tigny,
I just want to add that the additional solver options you mention for SIMCENTER 3D are available in Femap also.

Ng2020,
The functionality you mention that you would like to see in Femap, have you suggested them the the development team? It is my experience that they listen to suggestions smile.

Thomas

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close