×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Adams - issues with reaction wheel implementation

Adams - issues with reaction wheel implementation

Adams - issues with reaction wheel implementation

(OP)
Hi,

I have some problems with modelling reaction wheel in Adams. I need to analyze behaviour of separation mechanism that set both linear velocity along Z axis and angular velocity around Z axis to fly-away mass. In order to stabilize fly-away mass that is separated from a base and ejected, I want to use one reaction wheel, that will be rotating around axis aligned to Z axis. Reaction wheel is rotating with angular velocity of 23000 deg/s. Mechanism is analyzed in no gravity condition (separation and latter movement will take place in space). Unfortunately I am encountering some issues during analysis. First of all, angular velocity magnitude of reaction wheel and fly-away mass changes throughout the time and constantly decreasing, same is happening with angular momentum magnitude of fly-away mass and reaction wheel.

Picture 1, https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

Picture 2 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

They should not be changing, because after separation there are no forces acting on components. I am using timestep that is set at 1e-3s. Characteristics of the curves are also unsettling:

Picture 3 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

With smaller time step i.e. 1e-5 magnitudes of angular velocity and angular momentum are constant, but while plotting components of them, this is what I get (some peaks occur randomly):

Picture 4 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

To clarify, model without reaction wheel was also implemented and results have been validated. I assume that, issues are connected with reaction wheel.
In order to connect reaction wheel with fly-away mass I am using revolute joint, motion is assigned to the revolute joint (23000 deg/s around Z axis), initial angular velocity of fly-away mass is set at 0 deg/s around Z axis. Could you help me with finding out where the problem may lay?

Thanks!
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Adams - issues with reaction wheel implementation

(OP)
Thanks for answering,
Fly-away mass is not rotating at T=0, ejection system sets it in motion during first 0.15 second (Ejection system consists of compressed springs). As a result of ejection fly-away mass rotates with angular velocity of around 85 deg/s in 0.15s. To be honest I have no idea, what is happening in T=8, no forces act on bodies after ~0.15s. Reaction wheel shall rotate with angular velocity of 20000 deg/s from T=0 till the end of simulation. In first time steps (0-0.15s) there is a speed spike because of ejection of fly-away mass.

RE: Adams - issues with reaction wheel implementation

Is all this rotating in 3d? It could be a numerical problem as the local coordinate systems go into lock. Perusal of the msg file will probably give some hints. So you understand the initial jump in angular velocity at T=0, to 85 deg/s, the real puzzle is why the reaction wheel deg/s is so noisy, and whta the fly awya mass is up to at T=8. The inital jump on plot 3 from 20000 to 20070 is presumably the reaction wheel accelerating up to the same angular speed as the FAM, but that doesn't make sense to me if the only connection is a revolute joint.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Adams - issues with reaction wheel implementation

(OP)
It is rotating in 3D. Regarding reaction wheel angular velocity, I presume that plots are created in reference to global CS, while motion of reaction wheel (20000 deg/s) is assigned in reference to fly-away mass (~85 deg/s), so angular velocities may add up? I am also afraid that this may be numerical issue and contacted support as well.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close