×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

SCBF: X-brace

SCBF: X-brace

SCBF: X-brace

(OP)
Hi all,

Is X-cross bracing allowed in SCBF SFRS? Is there any special requirement at the X-brace intersection? Could not find anything on this in the code.

Thanks

RE: SCBF: X-brace

Yes. If youre going with this approach i'd probably stick with the tension-only provisions in AISC 341. IIRC the braces and columns must be designed for overstrength. Connections (clevis...clevii(?), turnbuckles, whatever youre using are designed for overstrength*1.5). Essentially they recognize that there's a lack of ductility in this system so you're bringing the forces back up to a "steel not detailed" level of demand. I don't remember the chapter but just look in the index for "tension-only" and you'll find it.

That said, i've only ever used these exceptions for tension-only rod bracing. Not-so-much for HSS-type spliced middle gusset ordeals that i think you're talking about.

RE: SCBF: X-brace

I was unfamiliar with SCBF and from the net...
"The Mission of the Scared Cat of Burma Fanciers is to promote the quality, health and temperament of our breed, the Birman. As a non-profit organization, we intend to generate income in order to promote our club activities, donate money to the research of cat health issues and to support other clubs' efforts to do the same."

These acronyms just send me for a spin...

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik

RE: SCBF: X-brace

(OP)
@ dold

Tension only is not permitted in SCBF. Why not tension/compression? The splice at the intersection will be designed for the capacity of the member.

RE: SCBF: X-brace

Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the OCBF tension-only exception which i've used for tension-only in SDC D projects. I.e., rod bracing for 'small' structures where R=3 isnt permitted.

But back to your question: I've never actually designed a single-tier x-brace SCBF. Only two-tier module types, where the 'x' occurs at an intermediate floor beam. The floor beam provides lateral stability at the connection. That said, if you look at 341-16 fig C-F2.15 it appears to show that this configuration is permitted, or at least addressed in regards to protected zones. Other than that, I can't find anything in the code that specifically addresses what you're asking. So we're back to square one.

I've got some details in my 'library' for SCBF connections at the X-intersection but I can't back them with any references.

So, two thoughts - spitball style:
1) Design the x-intersection gusset to develop the full compressive strength of the brace plus whatever material overstrength. I'd imagine it'd be a pretty thick plate and brace reinforcing.
2) Dig up some reference that lets you say the tension brace 'braces' the compression brace at the intersection and detail the gusset like you would the other gussets...

Interested to see if anyone else has input.


RE: SCBF: X-brace

I think as long as you follow the 70%/30% rule for the braces, there isn't anything special you would need to do. I would agree with designing the gusset to develop the full compressive strength of the brace like dold said.

Here's a snippet from the AISC 341-10 Commentary showing X-bracing without an intersecting floor beam as being an allowable configuration:

Go Bucks!

RE: SCBF: X-brace

Quote (straub46)

I think as long as you follow the 70%/30% rule for the braces, there isn't anything special you would need to do.
I'm not aware of this. Where's this statement coming from?

RE: SCBF: X-brace

Quote (straug46)

I think as long as you follow the 70%/30% rule for the braces, there isn't anything special you would need to do.

I think he might be referring to the idea that the "post buckling" strength of the compression brace should be considered to be 0.3 times its expected brace strength. For purposes of evaluating strength of members and connections for the case where the forces in compression / tension members don't balance (see section F2.3 - Analysis).

RE: SCBF: X-brace

I was thinking more of the allowable tension resistance being between 30% and 70% of the total horizontal force from F2.4a, but if I remember correctly I'm pretty sure they're related.

Go Bucks!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close