×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

In API 650 Edition 13th - (Shell-to-Roof) Junction Area

In API 650 Edition 13th - (Shell-to-Roof) Junction Area

In API 650 Edition 13th - (Shell-to-Roof) Junction Area

(OP)
In API 650 Edition 13th

(A) With regard to the (Shell-to-Roof) Junction Area, there are the following expressions;
1. Total Required Compression Area @ Junction calculated as in F.5.1.
2. (F.2.2 &/or F.4.1) stated that Participating Compression Area @ Junction determined by Figure F.2. (Presumed to be the Area Shaded with diagonal lines as stated in F.3).
3. (5.1.5.9 (e)), there are two statement that (Design Effective Area (cross-hatched section of Figure F.2) & Effective Provided Area by the Minimum Top Angle Size.

Quesion.1. From the 2nd & 3rd statements above, I presumed that the Participating Compression Area & Design Effective Area are the same (hatched area as calculated from Figure F.2). Am I correct?
Quesion.2. Effective Provided Area = Ar + As + Aa. Am I correct?

(B) F.5.2 stated For Self-Supporting Roofs, the Compression Area shall be ≥ Cross-sectional Area calculated in 5.10.5 & 5.10.6; however,
Quesion.3. There is Not stated which Specific Compression Area (Total Required or Participating)?
Quesion.4. in (5.10.5 & 5.10.6) there is No statement about how to Calculate this Cross-sectional Area? It’s just stated repeatedly that the Participating Compression Area shall be determined using Figure F.2.

(C) In case of Annex V applied;
1. V.7.2.2 stated the equation for calculating the Total Required Cross-sectional Area (Areq) in Cone Roof-to-Shell Joint Region.
2. V.7.2.5 stated the equation for calculating the Required Cross-sectional Area (Astiff) of Top Stiffener Structural Shape
Quesion.5. In such case which one will be applied, meant, either Total Required Compression Area as calculated in F.5.1 or in V.7.2.2?
Quesion.6. In such case which one will be applied, meant, either Required Cross-sectional Area as calculated in (5.10.5 & 5.10.6) or in V.7.2.5?

Mohd Yaseen

RE: In API 650 Edition 13th - (Shell-to-Roof) Junction Area

Question 1: Yes, but it's not clear if this is applied to the as-built construction or the corroded construction.
Question 2: Total area = participating roof area + participating shell area + area of angles/bars included as shown in F.2.
Question 3: The participating area per Figure F2 needs to be greater than the minimum calculated per 5.10.5 and 5.10.6 (nearly always is, in my experience)
Question 4: What is it that's not clear in Figure F.2?
Questions 5 and 6: The area determined similarly to Figure F.2 needs to exceed the minimums calculated in Annex V- Except that V.5 says to use as-built rather than corroded properties for this check, so the actual numbers may be different.

To summarize how I understand the requirements:
-Normally, you use a top angle of the minimum size specified. If you want to use one of the other details in F2 instead of a top angle, you can. But calculate the area per F2 using a standard top angle, and make sure the area using your detail is at least that large.
-If you have a self-supporting cone roof or self-supporting umbrella roof, calculate the minimum area required per that section, calculate the area in your detail per F.2 and make sure you have at least that area.
-If you have a pressurized roof falling under Annex F, calculate the area required per Annex F, and make sure your proposed detail has at least that much area per Fig. F2.
-If you have partial vacuum falling under Annex V, calculate the area required per Annex V, and make sure your proposed detail has at least that much area per F.2.
-And, not mentioned above, if you want a frangible roof, there is also a maximum area calculated that you cannot exceed.

RE: In API 650 Edition 13th - (Shell-to-Roof) Junction Area

(OP)
Dear Stephen;

Thanks for sharing your valuable ideas;

Following is my commentary to your responds;

Question 1: I presumed you meant Nominal THK for your stated expression of As-built THK. Whereas Total Required Compression Area as calculated in F.5.1 is based on Corroded THK, then I presume the Participating Compression Area (Design Effective Area) should be based on Corroded THK also.

Question 2: I guess that you have indicated Provided Area as Total Area.

Question 3: That mean the Compression Area referred to @ F.5.2 is the Participating Compression Area.

Question 4: I will rephrase question as follow: (Clause F.5.2 stated that For Self-Supporting Roofs, the Compression Area shall be ≥ Cross-sectional Area calculated in 5.10.5 & 5.10.6. The question is; when revert back to 5.10.5 & 5.10.6, you will NEVER FIND how to calculate the Cross-sectional Area ?)

Question 5&6: Can I summarized that the Area calculated in other sections MUST be Larger than (or equal) the Area calculated in Annex V as long its applied.

Summary Points:
- calculate the area per F2 using a standard top angle. Would you explain what you mean by calculate using a standard top angle?

Mohd Yaseen

RE: In API 650 Edition 13th - (Shell-to-Roof) Junction Area

"calculate the area per F2 using a standard top angle. Would you explain what you mean by calculate using a standard top angle?"

How I understand that requirement:
Assume you used the standard minimum top angle size (2"x2"x3/16" or whatever). Calculate the total effective area per the applicable F2 detail.
Then take your alternate proposed detail. And calculate total effective area per the applicable F2 detail for it.
And your alternate detail has to have at least as much area as that using the minimum angle.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close