Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Weld repair of caustic vessel (NaoH)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alpha Charlie

Alpha Charlie

Mechanical
Aug 11, 2021
16
A caustic vessel 6mm thick (epoxy lined)remained in service for 40 years. 1.2mm uniform thickness loss was found in 2021 and two indications (cracks) were found in shell to shell weld. Vessel is originally not post heat treated.

I need suggestions for following maintenance activities;

1- Is it advisable to carry out welding inside vessel without heat treatment? (Vessel is originally not stress relieved)
2- Is it recommended to coat vessel again (Epoxy coating)?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
IF the vessel is still sound and the cracks can be end drilled then why weld at all? The epoxy coating can be re-applied. Consider some fiber reinforcement in the areas with cracks.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The first order of business is to determine the mode of cracking.
The leading candidates, based on the limited information provided, are stress corrosion cracking and fatigue (or more properly, corrosion fatigue).
In situ metallography is in order.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Your post has so little information that it is impossible to comment on it.

What is the caustic material?

How large is the tank?

What is the temperature and pressure?

What is the tank material?

What is the epoxy lining?

Generally, if the tank is 40 years old, you should consider a new one. The types of lining materials have improved since them.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Can you repair, yes. Should you repair, maybe.
You need to plan on stripping the entire lining (unless it is only a few years old).
Do a very detailed inspection, there may be a lot more issues hiding.
Do all of the repairs and hire pros to recoat it.
Now think about it, you could just buy a new normalized & PWHT vessel with a modern coating, or put a lot of work into this one and still have a repaired 40 year old unit.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
40 year old kind of decides it ... how many kinds of industrial equipment are expected to live longer than that?

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The vessel has lost nearly a 1/16" corrosion allowance but you don't state age of coating nor do you specify whether cracks were on long or circ seams. Weld cracking would be more likely since the coating would most likely be non-uniform on them. But who knows how long ago the vessel was last thoroughly inspected. As Ed stated, you "still have a repaired 40 year old unit." In this case with probably over 1/2 its CA gone.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
First of all, I would like to thank you all for your responses.
Vessel diameter is 2200mm and cylindrical height is 2600mm. Vessel thickness of 6mm is already mentioned in my previous post. Corrosion allowance is 2mm so we can get along with 1.2mm thickness loss. Vessel design temp is 60 C while it is operating at atm pressure. This is the first time vessel being inspected.

We are doing MPI of all welds in the vessel. Until now 4 indications (cracks) of different lengths has been found all in welds. All these cracks are not visible in DPT. Vessel is not stress relieved and we found fallen coatings from multiple locations. I think built in weld stresses, non-uniform coating and service severity has lead to these cracks.

UFD and PAUT does not seem to fit here due to reduced thickness of vessel. We are not proceeding with any weld repair. I will appreciate if someone can suggest how to check cracks depth?

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Have you done any structural analysis? What is critical crack length in this vessel?
You intend to leave the cracks?
I hope that your replacement is on order.
This requires some detailed risk analysis.
You can use UT to measure cracks. I am sure that you find that they are longer than you thought.
But like all NDT there are limits of sensitivity.
If UT tells you that a crack is a specific size, that is given the test conditions and setup.
That isn't an absolute value.


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
EdtSainless,

No structural analysis is performed yet. All cracks are present in one weld and max length of crack is 8mm as found in MPI. We would mainly be focusing on monitoring cracks growth in periodic inspection. We are trying to check crack depth by UT but it has limitations due to vessel reduced thickness.

What risk analysis you suggest and what crack size will be considered critical crack for such a vessel?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I have joined late and hope the vessel is still in Inspection stage.

Carry out RT of the portions where crack like indications have been observed to be absolutely sure.

It seems you are going ahead with repair and further use of the vessel, so you need to be very sure regarding the defects, if any, at all except the coating damage.

Regards.

DHURJATI SEN


 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Inspect away, but detecting fine cracks is not a particular advantage of RT.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes agreed. These cracks are not detectable with RT.
DSCN0366_bhdxtm.jpg
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You don't plan on grinding these out before recoating?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Recommend using a rotary file or high speed fiberfrax grinding disc to remove cracks and recoat.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Weldstan and Edstainless;

At one location, welding capping was grinded up to 1mm but crack appeared as such. Since we did not find cracks in other welds of the vessel so most probably these cracks are due to built in stresses at fabrication times.
I am more interested in finding cracks depth now but not successful so far.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Did you consider caustic stress corrosion of low strength weld metal. I found it once where the wrong filler had been used.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes considered it but how to identify low strength electrode now?

I have a question and if someone has any experience regarding it, please share your thoughts;

1- What if we weld repair the cracks and perform PWHT of all welds (Even though vessel is originally non-PWHT)? API 574 recommends stress relieving of the CS in case of weld repair.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

kondori
  • Question
Inadequate PWHT holding time for Carbon Steel piping in caustic service (NACE SP-0403)
Replies
16
Views
8K
kondori
kondori
mrmalcolm
  • Locked
  • Question
Repair of pitting corrosion in stainless steel 1
Replies
3
Views
2K
0707
0707
rudiawan .
  • Locked
  • Question
materrial vessel for h2s removal
Replies
2
Views
492
shvet
shvet
YuJie_PV
  • Locked
  • Question
hot dip galvanized bolts forbidden on Stainless Steel vessel? 4
2
Replies
27
Views
2K
WKTaylor
WKTaylor
rudiawan .
  • Locked
  • Question
stastitical analysis of calculation of corrosion growth rates
Replies
3
Views
3K
EdStainless
EdStainless

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom