×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

(OP)

I have a part with three holes, with a diametric 1 mm positional tolerance defined at datum A, B, C for the two top holes.
I am having difficulty seeing how the tolerance is applied to datum C , being the inside face of that hole?
Datum A and B are clear to me, I.e., can vary diametrically 1mm from datum A and B.

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

Something else is wrong as the datum features A and B are given the (M) modifier so the Feature Control Frames make no sense.

This looks like an example question from a textbook asking to specify what is wrong with it.

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

datums a & b establish centerline of of two holes, the two holes must be perpendicular to datum c
a cmm would take care of all the constraints

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

and it depends how it is dimensioned

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

(OP)
Hi mfgenggear,

Thank you. You mention that it depends of how its dimensioned, can you elaborate ?

Note, that this image is just a quick model of the print I made for the post, because I can not share the actual print.

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

umatrix,

Your question belongs in forum1103: Drafting Standards, GD&T & Tolerance Analysis. Also, it is hard to read your figure. The fonts are too small.

Your question is practical rather than theoretical. Your datum features completely constrain your part. Your datum feature C is a feature of size, and may have to be called up at MMC. Fixturing to your hole will be difficult, although not impossible. Can you pick up the front or back face of your part instead?

--
JHG

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

it is actually easier to machine than to inspect.
I would use a 4 or 5 axis mill .
square up the block machine datums A, B and C simultaneously.
that way nothing has to be moved. then lay on a A & B pick up C or use a Diamond pin to locate.
datum c as drawn is not restrained but need to be held to Datum A & B and on center line of part
in order for two holes to fall in Datums A, B & C have to be held true position, that allows
two holes to fall in.
this is very doable.

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

I just want to know what workbook this is from.

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

(OP)
3DDave,

This is not from a workbook. I created it in solidworks, it is just a striped down version of the positional tolerance I was trying to understand. The aim was to understand the positional tolerance.

I was having trouble understanding how/why the callouts were referencing datum C. mfgenggear cleared it up.

On another note , I am happy you think my 3D drafting skills are publication quality. But then again you did say it was drawing of "what not to do", so I should not rejoice that much. bigsmile

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

Uhh, anyone can self publish. I was mislead by what looks like the shaded edge from a poorly done copier scan. I wanted to know what author to avoid.

So if you created it why are there (M) symbols applied to features that it cannot apply to? Why do diametral feature not have diametral tolerance zones?

Glad to see you take ownership, but baffled why you printed it and then scanned it.

I take it back - a scan would not skew the image, so this is from some other source. Since you did it you can provide a clean un-skew PNG with no trouble.

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

(OP)
I suspected that may be why you thought it was from a book.

I printed a paper copy, and didn't save the model. So I scanned the paper with my phone scanner (Tiny Scanner it is called) to pdf in order to upload.

About the (M) symbols , that is the way the actual part is specified by the previous engineer.

Unfortunately, I am weak in terms of GD&T, so I am trying to understand the basics of positional tolerance in reference to datums.

Part of the difficulty is not being able to share the actual print.


RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

That's a terrible phone app to do a scan that badly. But to a PDF and then from that to JPG?

Anyway - advice to those weak in Y14.5 Feature Control Frames - buy the ASME Y14.5 standard and read it. Come back with questions you have about that book before dealing with anything else. Otherwise it's just like https://thedailywtf.com/ where people try to guess what prior workers might have meant with senseless FCFs (Feature Control Frames)

RE: Position tolerance relation to datum inside face of hole

(OP)
Thank you 3DDave

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close