×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Standard Industry Practices

Standard Industry Practices

Standard Industry Practices

(OP)
In certain overhaul manuals, the manufacturer refers to "SIP" or "Standard Industry Practices"for  inspection, cleaning or repairs;they DO NOT mean the(ir) Standard Practices Manual!
What do you Americans mean by SIP? Do you simply mean something like "do it like you learnt it at school and use common sense", or is there a reference book (like the SAE manual)which lists SIP's?
Thanks for your reply,
avio

RE: Standard Industry Practices

Avio,
It has been my experience that what you learned in school or common sense have never been factored into cleaning, inspection or repairs of aircraft components. I for one have never read the reference SIP. My experience has been limited to PWA, GE, CFMI and Honeywell so we may not be working to the same set of rules. As a rule the Repair Manual dictates the specific steps taken. Generally it will refer you to the SPM and by that you have your procedures. When the Repair Manual differs from the SPM the Repair Manual is law. All manuals have specific processes, materials and sequences that must be adhered to. In the case of "or equivalent", you must be able to prove equivalency and it is a good practice to have that equivalency statement on file if you ever get called on it. If you think you can write a repair out of common sense without a DER approved by the FAA, then you are really going out on a limb. In closing, I will not offer an opinion on your question or it's intent, but I am compelled to offer this advice. READ YOUR FAR's. Part's 43 and 145 are the Repair Station's bible. Also be mindful of part 39. Change is constant in this industry, it pays to be aware of your surroundings.

Sincerely,
DJ Kallhof
Quality Engineer
NDT Level III

RE: Standard Industry Practices

Avio:
Expanding on what DJ1958 said, I would recommend FAA Advisory Circulars AC65.9A and AC65.15A, the airframe & powerplant mechanics General and Airframe handbooks, respectively.  There is also a powerplant circular (AC 65.12), if you need that too.  These are the books, along with AC43.13, where most U.S. civilian mechanics are introduced to aircraft "standard industry practices".  Even then, mechanics are always referred to the manufacturers data where ever possible.
I haven't been an A&P for 8 years now and I still look things up in these books, I think you will find them very useful.
Hope this helps.
Daniel South

RE: Standard Industry Practices

(OP)
Thank you both for your replies; I'm very familiar with the Ac's you refer to (65-9/-12/-15 and 43-13).It isn't either my intention to do anything without a DER's 8110 when outside the OEM manuals. I found the reference "folowing Standard Industry Practices" in a Boeing Manual; Tomorrow; I' look for the references and let you know.The reference was not referring to the SPM.
avio

RE: Standard Industry Practices

Please note that you can only use approved data that can be shown as being effective for the specific part, assembly or component that you are working on. "Standard Industry Practices" certainly cannot be used to sign off on work, and is really a non-usable term. Even AC43.13 cannot be used as a substitute for existing approved data. I have seen instances where parties did not have, or did not make the proper effort to get the correct tech data, and used AC43.13 as a shortcut to "get by" A good Inspector will nip this in the bud quickly.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close