×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Boundary condition, Node moving on a curve

Boundary condition, Node moving on a curve

Boundary condition, Node moving on a curve

(OP)
Hey guys,

I'm new in FEM and stuck with the following problem (TLTR: question is if 2B is theoretically correct?, I am grateful for thoughts about the other ones (1 and 2A)):

I have a (geometric) non-linear 2D analysis (lets say a pulled rope) and I want to use TRUSS elements.

-----------------------------------------
Problem:
Let's consider a very simple case A |>o------o B, single TRUSS element, where A is fixed and B is moving.
I want B to move along a prescribed curve lets say c(x) = [x, f(x)].

I am not interested in the dynamics, only the equilibrium.
I struggle with the appropriate boundary condition. I have basically 2 ideas in my mind.
------------------------------------------

1. Instead of using the conventional truss element stiffness matrix, derive one with different shape function, which matches with c(x). I haven't tried it yet, and I want my trusses only carry axial loads,
it might also bring some non axial loads in? And it also should be recalculated for each curve.


2. Use the conventional stiffness matrix for the truss. (Geometric stiffness is also calculated and incremental force is added, c is linearized around B_x0, so c(x) = (x, n*x))
Then my calculation basically becomes:
K*b = F_B
The A corresponding elements disappear, because A is fixed, so I have [k11,k12; k21,k22]*[bx; by] = [f_Bx; f_By] (1)
Possibilities that come in my mind:

2A
Prescribe a condition for f_Bx/f_By = 1/n, this is not so good, because the B coordinates also modify the force components, so I need more iteration

2B
Modify K before inverting. If I write (1), and use that k12 = k21 then after a short derivation, if k12 = (f_By*k11-n*f_Bx*k22)/(f_Bx-n*f_By) then the solution for b will be [x, nx], so my condition is basically filled. But I don't know if my approach is right, or if there is a standard method for a problem like that.

Thanks in advance.

RE: Boundary condition, Node moving on a curve

In FEA software we achieve such complex motion by breaking it into time-dependent boundary conditions with amplitude (various types: tabular, smooth step, periodic and so on) for each DOF. Maybe you could follow the same approach here. At least for comparison with other solutions.

RE: Boundary condition, Node moving on a curve

I would model as a roller contact on a track and run large displacement.

The other approach might be graphical ... like what we've done before computers. You know the path you want the free end to follow, a track. The reaction is normal to the track. If the other end is pinned and the applied load is a point vector (maybe a sum of a distributed load) then the beam is a three force member and you can draw a force polygon (in this case, a triangle). Now, whilst you don't know the two reaction forces, this triangle ensures force equilibrium, so check moment equilibrium to find the solution.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Boundary condition, Node moving on a curve

(OP)
Hey,

thanks for the answers.

@FEA way, do you have perhaps some links to online docs or something where I could read more about them?

@rb1957, it is a good idea. Am I interpreting right, that the geometric stiffness matrix does something similar? And I am just wondering, that the procedure I wrote in 2B does not accidentally do the same?

Anyways, great insights, thanks!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close