Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates

CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates

CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates


We are looking at using CS for a methanol storage tank and injection system at and oil and gas site. I see either CS or SS316 is suggested from various sources (e.g. ISO 21457, M-001 etc). Is it possible to calculate a corrosion rate for using CS? I have done some searching but can only find a rate of <0.02" per year (http://www.methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06...), based on this number the tank could fail in 7 years.

Also, the issue of SCC in CS with methanol, the following link suggests the methanol should have a concentration of <99% to prevent SCC - https://www.stepchangeinsafety.net/alerts-moments/...

Could anyone suggest a further reference that backs this up?

RE: CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates

Methanol in CS is playing with fire in terms of stress corrosion cracking risk. SCC doesn't have a 'rate', it is all or nothing. Then after you've built the perfect container, you then must closely control the contents in perpetuity.

Experts, not interweb references are what you are looking for.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."

RE: CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates

To suppress SCC in Methanol with CS takes something like 1-2% water content. (M-100 is 1-1.5% water)
If you can't allow that or control it then SS is the right way to go.
304L and 316L have been used if there is NO detectable Cl (ppb levels).
Using 2205 duplex should be an attractive option, its higher strength allows for a lighter tank and the increased corrosion resistance makes it more durable. Many reports show that replacing 316L with 2205 in tanks does not increase cost if the tanks are properly designed.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed

RE: CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates

Methanol storage tank can be constructed using CS with higher grade and provided CA 3mm. Additionally internal coating/painting with CP system to be consider if CS plate used. If cost allow for SS then CA=0 and no need for internal paint/coat.

RE: CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates

Thanks all for responding.

SKMoshin - is there a reference for that information? Happy to purchase the reference, I just can't find anything with the detail you describe.

RE: CS Methanol Storage Tank corrosion rates

Handbooks for construction of vessels for chemicals like this have been published.
Google is your friend.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close