Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
(OP)
My notion was that we should use counter current in the jacket because of efficiency but my friend said
"The co-current system is often used in industry for example, protection of acid corrosion economizer, temperature cross-over, etc."
In our case the case of this PBR, the inlet temperature is 150C, but the MP steam temperature is higher than 150C(MP is normally 10~25bar), so is counter current is not possible?
Does anyone has any reference or code for this?
"The co-current system is often used in industry for example, protection of acid corrosion economizer, temperature cross-over, etc."
In our case the case of this PBR, the inlet temperature is 150C, but the MP steam temperature is higher than 150C(MP is normally 10~25bar), so is counter current is not possible?
Does anyone has any reference or code for this?
Talk To Other Members
RE: Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
Good Luck,
Latexman
RE: Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
RE: Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
RE: Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
RE: Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
It seems strange to use medium pressure steam to cool a reactor. Perhaps you mean condensate?
Will the reaction run out-of control if it gets too hot. Still too many unknowns to answer your question.
RE: Choice Of Co-Current Vs Countercurrent PBR Reactor Jacket
Yes, runaway reaction occurs if the reaction is not controlled by a large amount of inert.